There are myriad factors or considerations which take into that the whole societies today expect young people to follow and obey the rules are too strict. As far as I consider according to the following reasons and from my personal experience, I am of the conviction that societies need to change there thinking with time and old rule are not fit with new time yet the rules made by societies are too strict to follow by young people today. Someone can consciously wight the pros and cons of each side. The reason for my conviction will be explored in the following essay.
The first exquisite reason which gives adherences to my viewpoint with the example is nowadays people change with time and with new technology people are more advanced than ever with new discovery every day people are forwarding with future but with the fact is people want to get advanced there thinking of societies and rules remain same people thinks that with these rule they find their success and want to pass and make forces siblings do the same my experience is an excellent the example of this in my country cast system is very much back when my school days I have few friends and one day my granddad came to ask about my friend and tell me to change me, my friend, as they are from different cast with event affect me lot because they are my friends and thing my granddad talking about is no more.
Apart from the fact mention above, one should consider another sublet point meticulously pertaining to obtaining huge experience. The noteworthy refreshing statistic revealed by recent social research conducted in my country in which majority of people have agreed that societies are old they have to change it because they don't help now for to people get better instead they made more gap between people and divide them in different societies, to shade light in this issue according to the research done by Delhi University in which some of the big power people used this rules to manipulate people as this way they say on the top keep getting benefits only handful of people, not the whole society.
Admittedly, someone can justification to another side by saying that the rules that made by societies are made from a long time and these people know better than us and this makes the balance between all societies moreover these rules kept people in the boundary so they don't do anything wrong everything work in an intended way but I still affirm that rules made a long time before and did not fit with today people, as a result, it's hard to follow them.
In summary, by all the affirmation above on should consider that the rules that the whole societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 73
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 73
- Topic: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill. 60
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should begin learning a foreign language as soon as they start school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your position. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
... viewpoint with the example is nowadays people change with time and with new technolog...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 719, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[10]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...they are from different cast with event affect me lot because they are my friends and ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...old they have to change it because they dont help now for to people get better inste...
^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...earch done by Delhi University in which some of the big power people used this rules to man...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...les kept people in the boundary so they dont do anything wrong everything work in an...
^^^^
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an intended way" with adverb for "intended"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... dont do anything wrong everything work in an intended way but I still affirm that rules made a lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, still, apart from, in summary, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66736401674 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35866113092 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468619246862 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 20.1344086022 263% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 243.772865341 48.9658058833 498% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 247.888888889 100.406767564 247% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.1111111111 20.6045352989 258% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327241824348 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195546522042 0.076458572812 256% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.197229234902 0.0737576698707 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261013242336 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178414501479 0.0645574589148 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.1 11.7677419355 230% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 58.1214874552 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.8 10.1575268817 224% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.2 10.0537634409 231% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.