Do you agree or disagree technology has made children life less creative than in the past. support your answer with reasons and examples.
Yes, in my opinion, technology plays a role in making children less creative.
When hearing the word "technology", the items that come to my mind spontanously include television, commputer, internet, and cell phone - the items that use up most children's time without much benefit to them, and the time that could be used in ways that would help children to improve their skills of creativity, communication, and etc.
It is a pity to witness in our country today that children, especially of younger ages, have been granted access to these devices. In most families, today's children watch TV until very late in the evening, use the Internet as they wish, use commputers to play games, rather than to process information, use cell phones for no particular purposes. In addition to these devices taking children's time, they pose threats to them as well. For instance, if there is no supervision by parents on children's activites of using these devices, they tend to review adult-related content, which may be detrimental to their characters at their young ages. Supervision that is not in place with respect to children's practices of Internet usage, they are even exposed to greater risks such as establishing relations with wrong and possibly dangerous members of society.
Given the setbacks of technology in development of children's creativity as well as its threats, I have decided to prevent my daughter from reaching out to any of these devices. I have not purchased a TV, the computer I have at home is only used for educational purposes and for watching a movie or any subject of her interest only once a week, she has no access to cell phones. These prohibitions paid off very recently. Thanks to her improved skills of creativity, communication, analysis that couldn't be obtained if her time had been taken by the foregoing devices, she was addmitted to a very competitive lyceum in the city.
I believe at young ages children's access to technology for entertaining purposes shall be restricted and closely monitored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-15 | Dharapatel23 | 70 | view |
| 2018-10-02 | Md. Dilshadur Rahman | 83 | view |
| 2018-08-19 | lilly | 90 | view |
| 2018-04-23 | sh | 73 | view |
| 2017-12-05 | mohammad.sh | 76 | view |
- The following appeared in an Avia Airlines departmental memorandum:“On average, 9 out of every 1,000 passengers who traveled on Avia Airlines last year fileda complaint about our baggage-handling procedures. This means that although some 1percent of our 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Unknown is necessary 33
- If rituals did not exist, we would have to invent them. We need ceremonies and rituals to help us define ourselves socially and culturally. 16
- The following appeared as part of an editorial in a weekly newsmagazine:“Historically, most of this country’s engineers have come from our universities; recently,however, our university-age population has begun to shrink, and decreasing enrollmentsin 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ir skills of creativity, communication, and etc. It is a pity to witness in our count...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 496, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...reativity, communication, analysis that couldnt be obtained if her time had been taken ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, in my opinion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09821428571 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03769750385 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592261904762 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.793330231 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.75 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107614138741 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455752459208 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377527985494 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725547894865 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310372813002 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.