Do you agree professional athletes such as the football player and basketball player deserve high salaries to be paid?
" Genius only means hard-working all one's life." Some people may think that professional athletes don't deserve handsome salaries to be paid, while others consider that they work terribly with their might not only for themselves but for the country. Hence, in my opinion, the price surely deserves talented athletes to gain.
First of all, professional athletes can easily receive countless times of injury than the general public. The example can be seen from the purpose of snatch victory in the competitive match, they must take a tremendous number of hours drilling, during which they may too diligently to overused the body parts and sprain the ankle or suffer a fracture. Simultaneously, the slightest wound can become the greatest enemy to themselves. However, they are unable to let any nasty injury interfere with their triumph. By contrast, how can those athletes sacrifice so much to risk their life to compete in the game at the expense of being injured severely? Thus, through the paid of handsome salaries, professional athletes are possible to obtain far more regular medical services and resources to sustain the body essence.
In addition, professional athletes can fight successful battles for the nation, which further establishes their reputation. Take my country for example, since the government pays for the training, most professional athletes fight for the honor in competitions such as Olympic and NBA, the international sports events. Then the impact of the prestige will be augmented by the beat-off competition. With the considerable prestige comes the respect and the chance of communication from all around the world. Only by paying handsome salaries can professional athletes swiftly build up the prestige of the country internationally.
Definitely, some people may think that professional athletes do not deserve a high salary. For instance, there is a disadvantage for talented athletes to deserve handsome salaries. Some athletes are too young to sustain the balance of enormous wealth. In other words, they may not have the capability to manage their emolument. Nevertheless, their parents can help them to clear up the financial problem. Consequently, I agree with the statement that professional athletes do merit the wealth they obtain.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree movies and televisions have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 66
- Do you agree professional athletes such as the football player and basketball player deserve high salaries to be paid 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking web site Use specific reasons and examples to 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...le may think that professional athletes dont deserve handsome salaries to be paid, w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...eive countless times of injury than the general public. The example can be seen from the purpo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92354056309 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579831932773 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6107365229 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.47368421053 5.45110844103 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215366577237 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681038782024 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606541062539 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138978105987 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354924245477 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.