face to face communication versus other types of communication

Essay topics:

face to face communication versus other types of communication

Many people think that letters, emails and text messages are the best way to communicate with others. They say we live a fast-paced age, we don’t have time for face to face communications which consumes a lot of our precious time. Although I understand their point of view, I have a different opinion. I believe there is nothing better than face to face communication. It enhances relationships, and decrease misunderstanding.
First of all, the major factor in any relationship is communication. Communications can be done through multiple routes, it can be written through emails, mails or text messages, or it can be oral through phone calls or meetings. Meetings or face to face communications plays important role in enhancing any relationship even if it is on business scale. There is a quote says “If you still have a friend who calls you often in this electronic world we live in, you must do your best to keep your relationship with this friend”. I believe this quote simply indicates the importance of the oral communication because the friend who sacrifices his/her time to call or meet his/her friend in person, means he/she cares about this friendship. Also at work when I communicate with a customer through face to face, I strength my relation with this customer which helps him/her to become a loyal customer of my company. There is no improvement in our human relationships without keeping our face to face communication.
Second, in our daily communications we express our emotions and words orally in various tones. Every tone carries a different meaning. Although we use now Emojis in our emails and text messages, still we find it hard to express our words real meaning through written communication. I experienced this issue a couple weeks ago, I sent an email to a coworker asking about an illustration of something happened. I got a response back from the coworker trying to illustrate the whole situation, but really there were missing emotions in this subject to show more details of what happened. As a result, I sent an email back to her asking for more clarifications, the other coworker replied to me. It wasn’t yet so clear, so I decided to call her, once I called her I got everything clear because I heard her voice and her intonation in our conversation. I heard words carrying emotions and expression. I believe it would be even better if I was able to meet her face to face. In my opinion, we can avoid a lot of miscommunication if we returned to use face to face communications more frequently.
In conclusion for the reasons mentioned above, I encourage each person to consider face to face communication as a primary way of communication. Why you don’t try to do it for just one week. If you did so, you will discover for yourself how much it easier and faster to understand the other person you communicate with. You will also discover how much you strengthen this relationship and avoid a lot of misunderstanding.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-19 himal view
2023-04-19 himal view
2023-03-13 Anurag96 76 view
2022-11-12 ctoluwasedaniel 80 view
2022-10-13 Allenwlh 78 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user martreem :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 749, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ans he/she cares about this friendship. Also at work when I communicate with a custo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: SENT_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'emailed'.
Suggestion: emailed
...ienced this issue a couple weeks ago, I sent an email to a coworker asking about an illustrat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: SENT_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'emailed'.
Suggestion: emailed
...etails of what happened. As a result, I sent an email back to her asking for more clarificati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, still, then, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 84.0 43.0788530466 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2478.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 507.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8875739645 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17307044806 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 791.1 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.826806062 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3076923077 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304267053553 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931512112879 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110225773278 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211910810572 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051787199721 0.0645574589148 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.