if you are required to give feedback about your classmates/colleagues (work or performance), would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first?
Without a doubt, people could create a dialogue with others, and they could give feedback to each other and help themselves to flourish. From my perspective, it is preferable to give positive comments first rather than negative comments. There are numerous reasons to support my opinion, among which two stand out.
First and foremost, by indicating the positive traits of a person, people could prepare an appropriate condition to critique be accepted by other people in continue. To be more specific, people constantly have carved to see a good opinion about themselves from others, which, in turn, give them a satisfying feeling about themselves. Therefore, when telling good things about them, they do not resist accepting your negative opinion. On the contrary, if people receive critique first, they will guard against the critic. This is because they think people criticize them intentionally and on an unfair basis. As a result, it makes it hard for them to accept the negative comments. Thereby, by telling their good first, they could prepare themselves mentally to give effective negative feedback.
Second, when telling the good features of other people, they give a great feeling about it which help people to improve their strengths. After telling good features, we could tell weaknesses, which people could work on them, without getting upset from us. A personal example would derive this notion home. Years ago, we got together with our university friends, and we started to give feedback to each other. At first, it was just fun, but my friends got serious and just gave negative comments to each other. Things got worse and caused friction between the guys. Having finished the party, friends got upset with each other, and some of them cut off their relationships. Consequently, had my friends not just critiqued each other, they would not have broken off their relationships.
To sum up, considering the reasons and the examples mentioned above, I believe that people must give good comments first, then say adverse opinions about other people. This is because not only do people tend to listen to the positive things about themselves, then they prepare to hear opposite comments, but they also get an excellent feeling when they hear good about themselves.
- tpo 70 3
- Some companies provide important products or service but also damage environment Some people believe that government should require more penalty higher tax and larger fine of these companies while others believe there are better ways Which do you prefer 68
- if you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important for governments to protect wild animals and wilderness areas for the future generations 76
- Today many employers are looking for various sources of information to understand job applicants better Which is the best way for the employers to better know the situation of a job applicant Contacting previous employers checking the job applicant s prof 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, as a result, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17520215633 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55111006011 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517520215633 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1757078345 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.55 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192774657703 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675941901948 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637459130152 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138564936098 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027158964561 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.