Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over

Essay topics:

Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In modern civilization, performing an// impeccable behavior has become during the class or meeting has been a critical manner for humans. A multitude of people are of the opinion that they should show their dispute in the case that something went wrong, others hold other perspectives, stating they should be quiet or interrupt the person who is speaking. I profoundly prefer waiting until the end of the session or meeting and then tell my objection to the speaker. There are several reasons, two of which will be explained in the ensuing essay.

The most paramount reason is that it is not appropriate to interrupt someone in the middle of their speech. Sometimes, when someone who is a speaker in a meeting or a class, he or she might find their mistakes or errors, and either correct himself or herself or ask others to do that. It is critically important that we give him or her the opportunity to others state their opinion and listen to their speech. Furthermore, not only will not we assess them to correct himself or herself, but also we might kill their self-confidence and their motivation for continuing their discussion. My personal experience demonstrates a compelling reason for this. Although I was known as a person who is an expert in presenting presentations without making errors, once in the middle of the speech in a meeting I pronounced a word wrongly. With others stated and pointed out my mistake, I lost control and got stage fright. Consequently, after that presentation, I am still insecure about presenting in front of a bunch of people.

Another noteworthy and exquisite idea that comes to my mind is that it is respectful to wait until the end of the speech and meeting to mention a mistake. There are some integral and essential manners that should be performed by all the audience in a meeting, one of them is showing our affection to the speaker by waiting for that person to elaborate all of his or her ideas. A vast majority of people do not care about the mistake, others are looking for finding a situation to make fun of the speakers. Both groups are making huge mistakes. Speakers need a quiet and silent environment to focus and concentrate on their speech. Either telling their mistake or being not minutely are considered as mistakes that some people execute during a performance. As a result, we are required to wait until the end of their speech and talk to them about their mistakes privately to both respect them and help them to correct their mistakes.

All in all, I would rather stay until the end of the speech to mention others' mistakes to be polite and respectful to not annoy the lecturer.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-14 Zmx_6 76 view
2023-07-12 Zmx_6 80 view
2023-06-28 Vivian Chang 70 view
2023-03-22 sonyeoso 76 view
2023-02-20 m.ghoroobi 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user afgmar :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, look, so, still, then, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77173913043 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74266421465 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484782608696 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.98799329 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151454936315 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473732462846 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486560907609 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098944635618 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042294334827 0.0645574589148 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.