To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
With the considerable development of modern society, the education condition in college is getting better than before. And in order to be well-educated in the college, people always want to own great quality of education. Some individules hold the idea that to improve the education quality, college should pay more to professors, while others do not agree. From my point of view, I am in favor of the latter one. The effects of professors are exaggerated.
Admittedly, when professors have decent salary, they can just focus on the teaching rather than improving their living condition. And colleges may even attract more excellent teachers to teach in their campus. However, if universities want to promote their teaching qualities, just increasing the salary is not enough, there are more things should be done.
For one thing, raising the money that is used to build infrastructure will benefits education qualities. Infrastructures are the bases of university's education activities. Can a college lacking of teaching buildings or sports centers be called good university? For instance, when I was in college as a freshman, the new library building was still under construction. And when I have to find somewhere to review knowledge or do some researches, there are almostly no place to go. I have to endeavor to find a place in the old library building against huge number of students. The work efficiency is pretty low. After the new building completed, I can feel free to find region comfortable and can have discussion with my mentor or classmates there. Paying attention to the infrastructure is one of the key methods to enhance the quality of education.
Moreover, improving equipment quality also play a significant role in rising the quality of education. To understand advanced knowledge in the college, at times, we need help from outside assistance, such as projection, computer. These things provide us a vivd understanding of some knowledge. For example, when students have a geology class in the college, by watching videos about the process of formation of mountains or glacier ice. Students will have profound understanding of what they have learned. Insteresting method can, and definitely will improve the teaching quality.
Based on the discussion above, in spite of the advantages to increase salary of professor, that they can pay more attention on student rather than their personal lives, I still hold the idea that university should not only spend money on salary, but also on infrastructure and equipments, in order to improve education quality.
- Some people say that teachers and parents should decide what assignment or activities children should do after school. Others say that children make these decisions on their own. Which view do you agree with and why? 33
- TPO-27 - Integrated Writing Task The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scient 66
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 80
- TPO-31 - Integrated Writing Task A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some 86
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...at is used to build infrastructure will benefits education qualities. Infrastructures ar...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'such as', 'for one thing', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257510729614 0.229887763892 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.156652360515 0.158761421928 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0708154506438 0.0866891130778 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0515021459227 0.046263068375 111% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0364806866953 0.0685040099705 53% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122317596567 0.118717715034 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0386266094421 0.0351676179071 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.0053473623 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0386266094421 0.0309702414327 125% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0793991416309 0.0887237588012 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0278969957082 0.0209618222197 133% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0150214592275 0.0139019557991 108% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2585.0 2387.08602151 108% => OK
No of words: 414.0 408.028673835 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.24396135266 5.86048508987 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.398550724638 0.338922669872 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.316425120773 0.251872472559 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.234299516908 0.174417080927 134% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.164251207729 0.112833075102 146% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0053473623 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533816425121 0.524397521467 102% => OK
Word variations: 60.8106745484 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 17.25 20.5533526081 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7137400767 48.84282405 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.708333333 120.699889404 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.5533526081 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.644075263715 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 48.8925120773 45.7405998639 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.71052631579 1.45489161554 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444878167788 0.300154397459 148% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0893296001453 0.103427244359 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0646219545981 0.0752933317313 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.480093655022 0.497263757937 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.161566488935 0.151897553556 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141373138682 0.114077575197 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093745180426 0.0781384742642 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.274237353609 0.336927656856 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0741805981343 0.067059652881 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280311493471 0.210909579961 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902889039806 0.0618886996521 146% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8870967742 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.