Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it or is it better to save your money for some time in the future? Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion.

Essay topics:

Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it or is it better to save your money for some time in the future? Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion.

There are some moot points about is it better to enjoy your money or save that? The question of spending or saving money has aroused as a subject of controversy among people. When it comes to my position, by weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that saving money for some time in the future is a logical action. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that due to the arduous situation in the economy it is very crucial to saving some money for difficult conditions. Many employers cannot spend employee wages, therefore, if we have not any saving money, we will encounter many difficulties. As a case to the point, I vividly remember two years ago, I worked in the corporation as a supervisor engineer. The employer in that project could not continue this project and did not spend our wage on time. As a consequence, I faced with poverty which was very upsetting for me. The corollary of this action persuaded me to save some money for this kind of situation. My personal example competently corroborates to the point that saving money is very beneficial for everyone.
By the same token, another paramount reason mentioned here is that, saving money help individuals to increase their provident ability, which is very instrumental for everyone. To be more specific, provident people always are a prospect in their life, on the other hand, an improvident person encounters many difficulties. My personal experience demonstrates this reality, I am a provident person but my close friend is very prodigal. He has kidded me always and told you are a miserly person. While I asserted that, I am a provident person. Accidentally he had a bad car crash which he needed some money for compensating the damages. Since he was a wasteful person, he has not any saving money and obliges to borrow some money from me. My personal experience shed some light on the point that saving money boost our positive ability.
In the nutshell, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that saving some money has many advantages for a human. This action not only helps them in arduous situations but also, fortify our provident ability.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-28 initialg 70 view
2019-02-11 30vil 66 view
2018-06-11 nuuuuuuu 65 view
2017-06-07 chloepark 70 view
2016-06-15 nazbanu 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user 30vil :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('miserly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('person') instead of another adjective.
...e has kidded me always and told you are a miserly person. While I asserted that, I am a providen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, kind of, by the same token, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86787564767 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79895514613 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515544041451 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5234260592 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4761904762 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.380952381 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287905561337 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915945922892 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981738417987 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187468972121 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952238139709 0.0645574589148 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.