It is better to have lots of friends than it is to have just a few friends.
Friends play a pivotal role in life. They are always influential in a person’s life. It is a dubious topic that having a few friends is beneficial or more friends. Although other people think that having lots of friends make the best group, I believe that a few friends are always closer than many friends. I feel this way because of a few reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, if people have a few friends, they are very closer to each other. The larger the group of friends, there are more chances to contention between them. Therefore, most of the people prefer to have a few friends. There are many benefits to having a close and a few friends. People can spend their leisure time with best friends at home or somewhere else. For example, friends can spend their free time watching the movie together, playing some quiz or playing outdoor games. Additionally, close friends tend to share their ideas and talks with each other without any hesitation since they know that they never share their private talk to anybody else. Besides that, the youngsters do not share their situations with their parents; instead, they share with their friends, because they know that only friends will understand their situations. However, if a person has different friends, he will hesitate to share his talks with many people.
The second and the same exquisite proof for this assertion is that having a few friends tend to have a strong friendship throughout life, so they are reliable with each other. In the modern era, people could find trustworthy people very scarcely. Therefore, the friendship of a few people will be long-lasting forever. The friends are not limited to the school and college time. Some friends are a blessing in people life. When people become adults, they have many responsibilities and lots of burdens. In these situations, close friends only hope of people, they can help them. However, more friends are often less reliable, it is difficult to trust because they do not know each other very closely.
By the way of the conclusion, I am of the opinion that a few friends are always beneficial for the people. They become close friends throughout life and help each other in a bad situation since they know their friends very closely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-24 | tinaskrd | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | Rustin_Panda | 66 | view |
- Torreya in Florida becoming an extinct 75
- birds injures from glasses 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 60
- tour guide trip is better 70
- parents should give money to children if they get high grade in school. Agree or disagree 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explore in the following essay. First of all, if people have a few frien...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to share his talks with many people. The second and the same exquisite proof ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y do not know each other very closely. By the way of the conclusion, I am of th...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they know their friends very closely.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, for example, i feel, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85969387755 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48369186308 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438775510204 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1991900878 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.375 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04166666667 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318505552547 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120830861136 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120434660435 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232970110622 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101077972782 0.0645574589148 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.