it is better to specialize in only one specific subject than to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects. agree/disagree
Having a glimpse of the education in the universities around the world, we will be marveled at the variety of courses provided for college students to choose. Indeed, as the society becomes more intricate, it requires more people who specialize in many subjects. However, some people believe that it is better to specialize in only one specific subject. This may contains some truth. Others hold the view that it is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects. For my point of view, I prefer the latter standpoint.
To begin with, problems encountered in this contemporary world are so complex that we cannot handle them without knowledge from multiple fields. For instance, in order to build a great building, an architect has to master not only architecture but also art and physics as well as economy, which is helpful when it comes to deal with budget. Therefore, it is by all means reasonable to study various academic subjects. here is a concrete example to illustrate. Madame Curie, a female Polish physicist and chemist, famous for her pioneering research on radioactivity. She studied chemistry and physics hard at college. Because of her board knowledge in physics and chemistry, she is the first scientist in history who were honored two Noble Prize, in both physics and chemistry. Evidently, she would have never be successful without her board knowledge.
Furthermore, students benefit from choose various academic subjects in that they are able to find what they really interest in. Without a doubt, taking courses in various fields provide them a chance to know what suits them most. Take my friend Micheal as an example. He was an innocent boy in high school who had never thought about his future. He had difficulties choosing his major in college. Therefore, his father suggested him try various fields as many as he could. He took art class, architecture, math and computer science in college. Finally, he found that he has a natural gift in computer science. Now, he is a successful software engineer.
Last but not least, to have broad knowledge makes our lives colorful. For instance, it is impossible for people who have not receive any art education to appreciate the meaning of paintings made by Picasso. Accordingly, it is unlikely for people who never take a music class to appreciate the music composed by Mozart. In addition, art education also does good to kids’ mental health which plays an important role in their proper growth.
To sum up, the merits compassed within having broad knowledge of many academic subjects outweighs those in specializing one specific subject. Considering all the details mentioned above, there is every reason to believe that we should have broad knowledge.
- land for human needs or endangered animals 73
- children should not be allowed to play with computer games, because playing computer games is a waste of time 73
- are students more influenced by teachers than by their friends? 90
- land use for human needs or for endangered animals 73
- has technology made children less creative than they were in the past 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Here
...ble to study various academic subjects. here is a concrete example to illustrate. Ma...
^^^^
Line 3, column 734, Rule ID: NOBLE_PRIZE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Nobel Prize'?
Suggestion: Nobel Prize
...ientist in history who were honored two Noble Prize, in both physics and chemistry. Evident...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'Prize' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'prizes'.
Suggestion: Prizes
...t in history who were honored two Noble Prize, in both physics and chemistry. Evident...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 810, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...mistry. Evidently, she would have never be successful without her board knowledge....
^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'received'.
Suggestion: received
...t is impossible for people who have not receive any art education to appreciate the mea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, in addition, of course, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2298.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09534368071 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73248649872 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565410199557 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.458458787 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2413793103 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5517241379 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.24137931034 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270850117784 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066039635368 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117365909533 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174850381254 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145293902694 0.0645574589148 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.