Leader comes naturally. Do you agree with this statement?
The leader plays an important role in taking a team to achieve success in any kind of sectors. Unfortunately, leadership is not easy to gain inasmuch as it is based on myriad elements; one stereotype suggests that leadership comes naturally. I, as a far-left supporter of this statement, assure that leading skill does not spark instinctively.
To begin with, people were not born with extraordinary skills, which means that everything has to be learned through the living time. To be more accurate, leaders need to have some special features such as emotional intelligence or observation skills which cannot come spontaneously. Hence, they have to take multiple courses regarding leadership in order to expand their knowledge in this field. Furthermore, should individuals guide other people in a team, they have to be trained for long years to manage different characteristics from members in a group. For example, up to date, there are several classes and events training leading skills and giving people opportunities for managing teammates. As a result, there is no doubt that everything has to learn from the fundamentals, and leadership is no exception.
Moreover, practical experience is extremely crucial to build up an outstanding leader, which is refined through failures. This is because no one will become perfect the first time in approaching something; therefore, mistakes taken as invaluable lessons solidify managers’ leading ability. Take my case as an example, when I was at school and led a class project with a small team. At first, I assigned tasks to members in my team, which was not effective since I mistakenly divided the mission resulting in their diatribe. Through that time, I recognized the structure of timelines and amount of tasks to delegate for each person.
By way of conclusion, leadership, an important skill in the modern world, has to be accumulated through learning seriously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-04 | toriettttt | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | toriettttt | 66 | view |
- Today students are more interested in politics than the past Do you agree or disagree 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Leader comes naturally Do you agree with this statement 66
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te, there are several classes and events training leading skills and giving peop...
^^
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are several classes and events training leading skills and giving people opportu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, as to, for example, kind of, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29315960912 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05283851882 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628664495114 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3238075794 48.9658058833 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117224261869 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374045669451 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360343285838 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659898127796 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453810128438 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te, there are several classes and events training leading skills and giving peop...
^^
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are several classes and events training leading skills and giving people opportu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, as to, for example, kind of, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29315960912 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05283851882 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628664495114 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3238075794 48.9658058833 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117224261869 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374045669451 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360343285838 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659898127796 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453810128438 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.