Many companies provide important products or services, but also damage the environment. Some people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to pay the penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when they cause environmental damage. Other people think there are better ways to stop the companies from harming the environment. Which view do you agree with and why?
As a result of dramatic rate of popluation growth, paying attention to human activitis causing environmental threats is a priority when considering many profound damages might come from of our ignorance toward this matter. Companies providing our basic needs, but also harming the environment are especially a major cause for concern. In this regard, many belive that making such companies paying penalty is the best way to stop them from damaging the environment while others belive that there are more better ways to stop this procedure. I, personally though, hold the view of the first group for some reason, on which I will elaborate in the following essay.
To begin with , being obliged to pay penalty, companies will try their best to avoid this repercussion, making them more incentive to seek out for more sustainable manufacturing approaches. In fact, money is one of the most signicant outcomes gauranteeing each company’s success, and because of that paying penalty can dramatically amend their approach about environment preservation. For exmple, in recent years many countries, such as Australia, Germany and Japon have enacted some strict rules for preventing enviromental threats of such companies, and they have gained conspicuous results. As recent reports have indicated this approach encourages many companies to devise meticulous plans so as to prevent being a threat for environment, and more importantly saving themselves from losing cash. Thus, had those approches not been enacted, those companies would continue to cause enviromental damages, ignoring their lethal role towards environment.
Furthermore, the revenue resulting from paying taxes and fines can effectively be used for making useful modifications in so called companies. To be more specific, the generated revenue can be devoted to training the company owners, their employees, and even ordinary people in order to increse their information about necessity of sustainablity in today’s world. In addition, this money can also be served as a valubale source of funding for many universities, providing them with the most up-to-date facilities to conduct relevent researches for both devising more sustainble processes, and producing more environment frienly devises for so called companies.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, requireing companies damaging the environment to pay penalty, not only will companies try to avoid destructive activitis, but also the generated cash can be used for many positive purposes.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In universities people tend to be concerned more about the career prospect of the subjects they learn Some people propose that students should learn subjects with fast job growth including science tech 70
- 1 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should state their honest opinions even though they know others will disagree with their views Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 68
- Many companies provide important products or services but also damage the environment Some people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to pay the penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when they c 83
- Imagine that you are going to visit a new city which one of the following ways do you think is the best way to know the city in a short time Visit historic sites Go to shops and markets Enjoy the restaurant and spend time in caf 73
- Which of the following do you think would be the most effective way that a teacher can use to make students more interested in classes using more technological ways Asking students to work in groups or teams explaining how the lessons have a connection to 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...ment while others belive that there are more better ways to stop this procedure. I, persona...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e in the following essay. To begin with , being obliged to pay penalty, companies...
^^
Line 2, column 694, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ny companies to devise meticulous plans so as to prevent being a threat for environment,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, thus, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58072916667 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97323757485 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580729166667 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7850010901 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.846153846 100.406767564 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5384615385 20.6045352989 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314663449762 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11622546829 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805921082381 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207635561546 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773070835655 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 11.7677419355 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 58.1214874552 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.1575268817 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.68 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.247311828 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.