More educators these days are using technology in the classroom. In fact, many teachers now record their lectures, upload them on a website, and ask students to watch them before their lesson. During class, students report on the lectures and discuss them together. Would you prefer to have traditional style class or one where the lectures are pre-recorded?
Personally, I would to prefer to have traditional class without different and unnecessary staff such as to listen a conversation or lecture before class will start. But with all the fact, technologies are needed in classrooms, I believe that this is one of the most important divisions in learning.
First of all, teachers are doing their job wrong if they are told to listen to lecturers in order to answer in class, because this leads to serious consequences for both the child and the teacher. Let’s look at an example, a student was asked to prepare for the lesson to answer questions after hearing a lecture about a new topic in the classroom, but the teenager could not understand this topic at the lecture and because of this he received a non-satisfactory assessment, so he decided to complain to the teacher. There are many such cases in our time as many schools have switched to remote education and because of this students of schools, universities and other educational institutions simply begin to get lost in a huge flow of information. However, it is clear that when students come to school a terrible mess in their studies begin.
Secondly, technologies such as computers, electronic boards, new devices and others make studying more comfortable and convenient, especially of course everyone will like to learn from new technologies from all popular companies around the world. Homework is done much faster because of this the productivity and intensity of learning in the classroom increases. For example, when I was in the 5th grade, we worked on sheets of paper because these were still no opportunities such as working on a computer and I had to write everything myself on a sheet for an hour or even more. Actually, in the 6th grade we brought a lot of different devices milking students and because of this, my productivity increased a huge amount and I began to study out all.
To sum up, the tuition may be different it depends on the finances of the school and on the state for students.
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 80
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- The diagram shows the lifecycle of the salmon 11
- The reading the painting cannot be attributed to Rembrandt The lecturer however suggests that painting could be created by Rembrandt 63
- The given graphs illustrate a waste ratio within the family of UK in 1985 and 2002 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 621, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ched to remote education and because of this students of schools, universities and o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: WILL_LIKE_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'would'?
Suggestion: would
...nvenient, especially of course everyone will like to learn from new technologies fro...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, as to, for example, of course, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83815028902 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89116745911 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578034682081 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8144147591 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.181818182 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4545454545 20.6045352989 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5454545455 5.45110844103 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181571488798 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641357830799 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416172126691 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906389663422 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735148014374 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.