Most change is not necessarily progress.
A glance at many kinds of changes in personal and social level brings light question that several times provoked discussions, that is, whether those changes directly lead to progress to individuals or communities. Some people contend that all changes mean development in society. However, I would like to suggest that not all changes are connected to a progressive consequence, in terms of trend and adaptation, as well as a policital change. In the ensuing paragraph, I will try to shed some light on this point of view through ample examples and conspicuous reasons.
The exquisite point to be mentioned firstly is that changes might merely present specific trends. The contemporary Korean food industry will provide clear example for this opinion. For past few years, there have been countless trends in exotic food that people got crazed for. Those food include 'honey chip iceream', 'Thaipei castera bread' and the list goes on. However, theses trend had nothing to do with the improvement in general cuisine culture, nor the sanitary issues in food industry. Instead, they just whipped out people's money for a short period of time.
Another point to be mentioned is that changes can be a form of adaption. My personal experience will demonstrate this standpoint. When I was young, I was an introverted and shy kid, and this characteristic of mind made me hard to related to people. Nontherless, as I grow up and started doing job, I had to pretend myself as a sociable person. As a result, I am an outtrovert person at a first look now. But noting in my mind had changed, and I feel even depressed for my situation that I always have to fake my smile and mood.
Although the above mentioned reasons cross the mind at a first sight, it does not mean that they are the only one. Actually, there is another subtle point that has to be borne in mind. It should be noted that some of the changes might backward the preexhisting progress. For instance, the president of Philipine right now is noctorious for his violent security policies, and more seriously, his homophobic and misogynic political stance. It was reported that several months after he was elected, many laws regarding women and LGBT people changed in a way that punishes them strictly. This shows that bad political changes brings the society backward.
Due to the foregoing ground, I firmly believe that not all changes brings progress, and trend, adaptation, and political aspect are 3 prime and momentous reasons.
- Most change is not necessarily progress. 83
- A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Agree or disagree. 90
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good neighbor? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 78
- It is better to use your own knowledge and experience to solve problems than to seek advice from others 83
- Martin Bernard's Afrocentrism 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'Those foods'?
Suggestion: This food; Those foods
...exotic food that people got crazed for. Those food include honey chip iceream, Thaipei cas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 548, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t whipped out peoples money for a short period of time. Another point to be mentioned is that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... borne in mind. It should be noted that some of the changes might backward the preexhisting...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, regarding, so, well, as to, for instance, i feel, in general, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92601431981 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68975335278 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589498806683 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5813612501 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7391304348 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2173913043 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86956521739 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164696757798 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485539786409 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674674921327 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106565372421 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703596810288 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.