In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that if people check some different news resources, the possibility of transmission false news decrease in the society. Contrary to this popular belief there are still those who argue that all of the news resources share the same news about each event, thus spending time on reviewing several different news resources is just wasting time. I, to a great extent agree with this idea that in order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
First and foremost, today some of the news networks put the fake and creative news on their website to attract more people and increase profit. Today, because of a very quick rate of increase in the number of new web news, networks and newspapers, identifying lawbreaker by oversight organization take some weeks or months, and during this times they could diffuse a lot of creative news in the society. For example, last year after Earthquake in the Kermanshah (a city in Iran) in Iran, several fake news resources created very stressful atmosphere in the society through realised a lot of lay news between people, like the possibility of happening other Earthquakes in other cites, even some of them had been predicted exact time and day for this Earthquakes.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that different news company change news content or explain happens based on their own political direction or their benefits. In this case, the reasonable decision for people is that they check some different news resources with a different point of view to obtain more realistic information about events. In addition, get information from several different databases led to we could access to more complete details about different subjects. Because sometimes receiving incomplete news led to misunderstanding and incredible concern. For example, last week I read a paper on the local newspaper about a violent person who threatened young women, but this newspaper did not mention that this person arrested by police, they just published incomplete news to destroy new police boos in our city.
On the basis of reasons that mentioned above, I am convinced that getting information from many different news resources led to prevent from growing fake news resources, and more accurate information about political and social events. Also, it can avoid from misleading.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their community 95
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examp 44
- TPO 35- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 45-integrated 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ef there are still those who argue that all of the news resources share the same news abou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
... event, thus spending time on reviewing several different news resources is just wasting time. I,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 487, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...med, a person must get information from many different news resources. First and foremost,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...esources. First and foremost, today some of the news networks put the fake and creative...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n take some weeks or months, and during this times they could diffuse a lot of creat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'in Iran'.
Suggestion: in Iran
...ter Earthquake in the Kermanshah a city in Iran in Iran, several fake news resources created ve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d been predicted exact time and day for this Earthquakes. Another significant fa...
^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...ents. In addition, get information from several different databases led to we could access to mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...convinced that getting information from many different news resources led to prevent from grow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, thus, well, even so, for example, in addition, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22879177378 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78563144261 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54498714653 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.4019808079 48.9658058833 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.461538462 100.406767564 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9230769231 20.6045352989 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400388667182 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16194903393 0.076458572812 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178690323873 0.0737576698707 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274551266145 0.150856017488 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144572369565 0.0645574589148 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 11.7677419355 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.