People learn things better from those at their own level - such as fellow students or coworkers - than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
Learning ability varies from person to person. Some people can grasp easily from their teacher or supervisor and some can seek a help from their fellow students or co-workers. I personally believe persons can learn from teachers or supervisors in better way than from fellow students or co-workers. There several reasons to support this opinion.
Firstly, our fellow students or workers have learned their things from our teachers or supervisors only. So, if we are asking help from other co-worker or students, we are indirectly asking help from our teachers or managers only. For example, whenever I faced any work related challenges, the first help I took from my co-worker who just have experience of 5-6 months in that project. However, he also got his doubt cleared by our manager only when he first joined the project and no senior colleague available that time. So, basically the understanding is coming from our teacher or supervisor through our fellow students or co-workers.
Secondly, teachers or supervisors don't get a time to solve each and everyone's small doubts. Because of this, we generally take help from our immediate seniors who studied or mentored under our teachers and supervisors. In this scenario, suppose I asked for help from colleague in the organization about our project. If that colleague doesn't have better understanding, then in that case we definitely contact our higher level manager who have good experience in the project.
Thirdly, the teacher or supervisors are more experience than whole class or the entire project team. Because of this, they have more real-life example to explain certain understanding. When I joined my first organization, I thought I can do any work related to the training which was delivered. However, when I got into first real-time project, my supervisor had helped me and my other colleague with his previous experience from the project. It helped us in a great way to understand the gravity of project overall.
In sum, the teachers and supervisors can help or teach to their students and employees in better way because they have good understanding on the subjects and they can share previous experience and real-time examples to emphasize the importance of subject or project to fresher.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-26 | Dhaval2693 | 73 | view |
- People are too quick to take action; instead they should stop to think of the possible consequences of what they might do. 58
- In Megalopolis the number of law school graduates who went to work for large corporate firms declined by 15 percent over the last three years whereas an increasing number of graduates took jobs at small general practice firms Even though large firms usual 77
- Letter of recommendation 11
- While some leaders in government, sports, industry, and other areas attribute their success to a well-developed sense of competition, a society can better prepare its young people for leadership by instilling in them a sense of cooperation. 50
- To choose own business or franchise 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s. Secondly, teachers or supervisors dont get a time to solve each and everyones ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...on about our project. If that colleague doesnt have better understanding, then in that...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 457, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a great way" with adverb for "great"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...perience from the project. It helped us in a great way to understand the gravity of project ov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17391304348 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8083000041 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48097826087 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6287877987 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.210526316 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205252192279 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757334467986 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741225885813 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123969652213 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756589961859 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.