Should Teacher of the Year awards be decided through student evaluations of teachers, or through evaluations by other teachers? Please explain.
Many people think that it is a good idea to evaluate teachers every year and give them award for their teaching performance. While some people think that teachers should be evaluated by other teachers, I hold the opposite view. Personally, I agree that students should evaluate their teachers every year.
To begin with, students know their teachers better that anyone else. They have a daily contact with their teachers in classes, so they can know the real performance for teachers. Furthermore, they are able to know if one teacher has a good style of teaching and he/ she able to deliver the message for students or not. Students can measure that by their understanding of lectures; and their performance in their final exams. For example, I had a good English teacher at my high school. He used to explain English vocabulary very well to students. Therefore, most students did a great job in their English final exam. Obviously, these students would not get that perfect result if their English teacher was not performing well. Thus, by letting students evaluate teachers, they can choose the most effective teachers in their school who help them to improve their knowledge.
On the other hand, when teachers evaluate each other, they can choose the wrong teacher for the award because most teachers are friends with each other. They tend to spend most of the time together in school and sometimes out of school. As a result, they can show their preference in the evaluation to one of their close friends to get the award. For instance, when I was at elementary school, my math teacher Ahmed had very close friendship with other math teachers. They tend to go and smoke hookah everyday together. In addition, one of these math friends married from one of math teacher’s sister. Therefore, imagine when these teachers evaluated each other, they would defiantly give the wrong evaluation because they would show their preferences to their friends.
In conclusion, I encourage schools to allow students to evaluate their teachers. This is because students are the best person who have a daily interaction with teachers; and they are able to know the real performance for most teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-07 | chelsey | 75 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | osfallatah89 | 60 | view |
- Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international celebrity. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents job. Use specific reasons and examples to support your 60
- A friend of yours has received some money and plans to use all of it either to go on vacation or to buy a car. Your friend asked you for advice. Compare your friend’s two choice and explain which one you think your friend should choose. Use specific rea 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the real performance for most teachers.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00546448087 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56388411338 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456284153005 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6751184919 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2380952381 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19047619048 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318312779241 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121613587179 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964562927764 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24017800288 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100152446152 0.0645574589148 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.