Some people say that in all levels of education too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
An education provides a significant base of knowledges for future. However, I am for the idea that students get not enough practical skills and too much theory in all level of an educational system, which leads to troubles in a first work place and a lack of soft skills.
To begin with, what a great difference between a worker who comes straight after a university and an experienced one or between a first course student and an older one? Beginners of any field do not familiar with how actually a mechanism works. For instance, when I started my career as a landscape designer, I did about tree or four different versions of plans and asked a customer what should I changed. After a year It was clear that those approach to work spent my resources and time inefficiently. As I did not know how to work with people I did a lot of useless moves and fussed about unnecessary items. The practice helped me elaborate on algorithm how to do work done, therefore how to live and earn money.
The next idea in favor of the first one is that people with excellent education sometimes can not find their place in a society. They are great at a theory and can compute difficult math tasks. However, those unacknowledged people due to lack of soft skills misses opportunities. For example, friend of mine is talented mathematician. He has finished two universities with prestigious diploma and up until now he worked as mechanic in an asphalt plant. All of the above is a good illustration of how an individual with magnificent knowledges of the subject did not find application of them.
To sum it up, I claim with confidence that persons due to education get a lot of theory and lack of practice. This is happened to me and people around as well.
- Best friend 40
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Agree or disagree 65
- about mandatory elections 3
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 76
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...worked as mechanic in an asphalt plant. All of the above is a good illustration of how an ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6270096463 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82917638133 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56270096463 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3672559296 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9375 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137514688815 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042160663372 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556993909723 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942035427727 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656295605154 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.