Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment. Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs. Which option do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this fast growing world which industrialization and technological advancements have taken a major role, improving the environment is an important element to have a healthy and good life. I strongly prefer giving funds to improve the environment by the government which is better that supporting art. I feel this way because of two reasons which I will explore in this essay.
First of all, no one can deny the significant impacts the climate change has on peoples’ life these days. Recent decade shows the population ratio increased drastically, and it becomes so hard to control the environment we live in. Talking about the human activities as an example, increase in the greenhouse effect resulting especially from pollution and other activities such as greenhouse emission produced by human activities mainly industrial process and transportation. Consequently, these sources of deadly greenhouse gases, which are the main cause of global warming. As a result, the entire world will suffer including people, animals, and planet species as well from this global warming phenomena if the government not willing to enhance the environment improvement. Similarly, humans can be more eco-friendly if the government allocate money to get the environment improved, decreased the factories production, and using eco-friendly cars. For instance, Teslla cars today using electricity than gas to help the eco-system, so; the government can change the public transportation and peoples’ cars with Teslla cars instead.
Secondly, life is changing very quickly, people necessities also, increased. In this era, the needs for food and housing demands along with other basic necessities also raised. For instance, cutting down more forests to make space for housing, landing, and other buildings increased in this modern society people lived. As a result, accounts for twenty percent of carbon emission. Consequently, no refreshment to the oxygen level will be done often so; the governments’ responsibility is to develop more forests and grew up more trees to help the environment get fresh air.
To put it in a brief, I strongly agree that the government has to allocate funds to aid global warming diminished. This is because unusual raises of greenhouse gases to the environment caused by increasing in population ratio and people necessities to get of forest has to be eliminated to have eco-friendly activities instead of increases the global warming.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Improving transportation is the best way for governments to promote economic growth. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephone has greater influence on people’s lives than television has. 48
- When you face difficult problems in life, what do you feel is the best way to solve them?•asking someone with more experience for advice about the problem•finding information about the problem using the Internet•taking a long time to think about the 76
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout the human activities as an example, increase in the greenhouse effect result...
^^
Line 3, column 907, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'factories'' or 'factory's'?
Suggestion: factories'; factory's
...the environment improved, decreased the factories production, and using eco-friendly cars...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es' cars with Teslla cars instead. Secondly, life is changing very quickly,...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...od and housing demands along with other basic necessities also raised. For instance, cutting down...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstead of increases the global warming.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, as to, for instance, i feel, such as, talking about, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2101.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17583721201 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5739862212 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.588235294 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167713830461 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562359224797 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580819229694 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101033501677 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340137071527 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.