Some people like to work at home, while others prefer to work in the office.
Undoubtedly, job is one of the integral part of people’s life. We need to work to make a living for our family. It is critical to have the best environment as much as possible in our work place to have the most efficacy. While some people think that working remotely is a wonderful option, I, personally, believe working in work-place have more advantages for employees. In the following essay I will delve into my reasons to substantiate my standpoint.
First of all, work-place in which we have access to all resources and materials, encourage us to concentrate on doing our task. Work offices or factories environment provide employees what they need to do their best continuously and appropriately. For example, my father work as a financial manager in a big company and to do his job he needs to access to a huge amount of data and specially to a well-developed computer system with sophisticated software, which I can’t imagine that my father could have access from home. In addition, he needs more supplies like files, printer, and a high-speed internet connection, which makes him to be dependent to his office. As we see it is not possible for my father and many people to work from home.
Second of all, work in accompany with other colleagues in a work-place provides employees a golden opportunity to communicate with each other directly. Owing to the importance of face to face communication between coworkers, there is high chance that work-flow progresses in a fast and smooth fashion. For example, in the hospital that I work, as a pharmacy intern, our everyday pharmacy huddle is a good situation to talk about all daily issues around our work condition. Having these short conversations between all pharmacy employees not only helps the flow of information, but also makes a friendly rapport through which the chance of any mis-communication decline dramatically. If we work from home, we will not have this productive meeting which will affect our efficiency.
In conclusion, considering all aforementioned details and reasons, I strongly believe that working in office have more pluses rather than working remotely. This is because in work-place we have access to all resources and materials that we need to work efficiently and because we can communicate directly through which we can deal with all issues fast.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Bikramyoga | view | |
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 70 | view |
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials Companies that receive 80
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest f 80
- TPO 29, Integrated 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who cannot accept criticism will not succeed working in teams 70
- When you give money to charitable organizations do you prefer to choose how the donation will be used for example donate money on food or service or advertisement for organizations or leave the decision to the organizations 30
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03608247423 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05107181459 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523195876289 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6837337172 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.941176471 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308494103275 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112319740592 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842785690311 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200953810442 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037929431758 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.