Sometimes it is better to be dishonest.
Some people believe that honesty is the best virtue within social communication. Others say that sometimes people have to be dishonest for positive outcome. I agree with the latter with two elaborated reasons.
First, being dishonest can arise positive effects. Most people think that the dishonesty eventually brings a negative effect for both people and their related groups. However, being a dishonest person sometimes can be helpful for people if someone choose to act dishonestly with a good purpose in a positive manner. For example, during my school years, I used to walk back to my studio after attending lectures. The route that I used was a shortcut which did not have any kinds of lights. One day, I finished my classes in late night and walked back to my studio as always. There was a man and a woman in the road. Surprisingly, I found that the man followed th woman with weird face. The lady realized the mans’ awkward action and frightened immediately. I seemed she need some help. Therefore, I went close to her and whispered that you can act like I am your boyfriend until the weird guy disappeared. After that, I yelled weird guy to get off the road. She was satisfied with my help and treated me later with foods at a fancy restaurant.
Second, the confliction among the society become seriously negative. Unexpected accidents such as stalking may happens to anyone. By being dishonesty, people can prevent those accidents. Most people in Korea use “Coupang’ which is similar with the ‘Amazon’ of U.S. Products that people ordered can be delivered to their front porches. However, this convenience has its critical false that people have to reveal their personal identities to get their parcels. For people who live alone, it can be a root of serious crime. Therefore, most young people who live without their families fake their identities to prevent the accidents. By using wrong name and fake phone number, they can easily avoid the problems from giving their personal informations. The police department of Korea announced that the crime for single women can be deceased if they use the fake informations.
In conclusion, many positive effects are given to people for bring dishonesty for positive purposes. Therefore, I insist that it is better to be dishonest time to time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-15 | sara.ana | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | samjhanas1 | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | prakriti malla | 3 | view |
- Some students prefer to study alone Others prefer to study with a group of students Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
- My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparent experienced when they were young 3
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lecture Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussion Which do you prefer 73
- Movies and television strongly influence the way people behave Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'chooses'.
Suggestion: chooses
...es can be helpful for people if someone choose to act dishonestly with a good purpose ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive manner" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... to act dishonestly with a good purpose in a positive manner. For example, during my school years, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 567, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...e night and walked back to my studio as always. There was a man and a woman in the roa...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1044, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...later with foods at a fancy restaurant. Second, the confliction among the societ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...ose accidents. Most people in Korea use “Coupang’ which is similar with the ‘Amaz...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, honestly, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97674418605 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68706021219 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56330749354 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0741596098 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.3333333333 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210151773045 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059662757779 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114597094483 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148127605639 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482798786848 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.