A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than
excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Education is the foundation to lead a successful life for any individual. In this process, teachers play a key role in creating a learning environment for students and to support the learning cycle. Some people believe that a teacher should be having excellent knowledge related to that specific subject while others believe they should have the skill of moving with the students well. In my opinion, the interactions with the students is essential as the subject matter can be learnt from other sources whereas the teachers’ having the super power to mold a better citizen to the nation.
To begin with, a teacher is a game changer in one’s life. They can interrupt the bad behavior of students to bring their good moral qualities back. For an example, a teacher can interfere to the situation where a child is addicted to drugs or bad practices. He can be a guiding light to that student with a proper consultation to bring him back to the everyday life. In these cases, students prefer not to get advised by their own parents, but they show due respect to listen to teachers. Moreover, teaching is a profession which creates a platform to interact with the entire lives of the children to uplift them.
Secondly, a teacher should have the understanding of providing the emotional intelligence to the students more than subject oriented intelligence. Emotional intelligence even brings new life to acquire subject matters even better. When a student is facing a family problem, financial problem, a teacher should have an understanding or a super power to identify what the student is going through. Helping them to overcome these challenges provide them a helping hand to get back to his systematic education process. Furthermore, a teacher should not teach a bright student in the class. They should be objective and consider all children as their own.
Additionally, a teacher should have excellent communication skills to deliver the subject matter effectively which will be remembered for years. Even if someone has followed a higher degree on that subject, he will not be the best teacher. He will not be able to present the knowledge in way accessible to the unmatured minds. The teacher should convey hard concepts in those areas, following novel approaches with illustrations. This is to address the different categories of auditory, visionary and physically experimenting learning habits of the students.
In conclusion, the teachers that we remembered the most are not the ones who taught us excellent subject matter, but the ones who taught us life lessons and the ones who understood us. This is the skill they required to dig into the thinking and the learning process of a child effectively.
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 69
- professors appearing on tv programs 80
- TOEFL integrated writing: Dutch painter Rembrandt 3
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08017817372 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88997106873 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510022271715 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1779421757 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1739130435 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5217391304 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272283639935 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730826261761 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575414992116 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150042942209 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503735717329 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.