Technology designed to make people’s lives simpler makes people’s lives more complicated.
There is no denying, I daresay, that technology is playing and will keep playing an indispensable role in people’s life. And there are always different voices toward this topic that whether technology makes the world an easier place to live in or not. From my point of view, I think that “yes”, it, the great technology, has improved the world’s ease of life.
Firstly, what is technology? It can be defined as the use of the scientific knowledge for practical purposes, for instance. Windmills, the device used to generate electricity by collecting the natural wind, is a form of technology, so are cars, computers, canned food and medicine. Life will be inconceivable if it is absent of those smart treasures. Say, if a man wants to visit his old sister who lives a few thousand miles away, he choses to walk, taking, say, a month which will be a really tough time for the poor man; instead, if he takes a train or airplane, the technology product, he only needs half day or two hours to get there. Therefore, how would people like to live without anything invented by man? The irrefutable fact is that even something as simple as shoelaces or rubber bands are examples of technology; in other words, technology is omnipresent.
Apart from the exact definition of technology, technology itself is rather beneficial for people. Technology extends the access of knowledge. In the past, researchers had to pull out of their wanted books from the heavy, dull, shelves to find materials for their study, and they had to take the risk of having incomplete even stained pages, while today’s researchers are much comfortable. Because of the technology, researchers at present can find their particular books through the online-book network, and they just need to type the key words of the book; the book’s title will come onto the screen immediately. People even complained that technology makes our researchers “lazy”!
Admittedly, some people may say that technology have bring us negative influence: no communication between people; reverse evolution, people are losing some skills like handwriting due to the technology; increasing fail rate of tests. However, technology, it does spread the communication between people, ranging all around the world. For example, I can talk to my overseas uncle anytime by phone or I can have a FaceTime with him by Skype or Wechat; therefore, without a doubt, there is communication between me and my uncle. And without these technology tools, we cannot talk to each other easily. In a word, technology itself is totally good to people, and the different uses of it may lead to different stories.
In conclusion, technology does make people’s life simpler.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-23 | AugustRush | 92 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | AugustRush | 76 | view |
- three possible theories about the purpose and meaning of the carves stone balls 80
- Robert Redford Protect Our Wild Horses 70
- three possible theories that could explain the extinction of the Steller's sea cow 86
- One quality that a successful leader must have is to make decisions quickly. When a leader takes too much time to make decisions, he will be seen as ineffective to the people he leads. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Should children spend most time playing and studying, or they should be required to help the family with household chores, like cooking and cleaning? 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: KEY_WORDS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keywords'?
Suggestion: keywords
...network, and they just need to type the key words of the book; the book's title will...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
...ome people may say that technology have bring us negative influence: no communication...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'apart from', 'even so', 'for example', 'for instance', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237749546279 0.229887763892 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.139745916515 0.158761421928 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0780399274047 0.0866891130778 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.043557168784 0.046263068375 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0508166969147 0.0685040099705 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110707803993 0.118717715034 93% => OK
Participles: 0.02722323049 0.0351676179071 77% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.04051948598 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.02722323049 0.0309702414327 88% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0834845735027 0.0887237588012 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.021778584392 0.0209618222197 104% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00725952813067 0.0139019557991 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2745.0 2387.08602151 115% => OK
No of words: 447.0 408.028673835 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14093959732 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.351230425056 0.338922669872 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266219239374 0.251872472559 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203579418345 0.174417080927 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.161073825503 0.112833075102 143% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04051948598 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58836689038 0.524397521467 112% => OK
Word variations: 73.2217603651 59.2087087015 124% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2857142857 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4484179513 48.84282405 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.714285714 120.699889404 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.761904761905 0.644075263715 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 47.9076382231 45.7405998639 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.60465116279 1.45489161554 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254520958692 0.300154397459 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0987289038602 0.103427244359 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0609733361267 0.0752933317313 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.502748135671 0.497263757937 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.177613122843 0.151897553556 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106476796083 0.114077575197 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925587343559 0.0781384742642 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.289213161526 0.336927656856 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0803602259699 0.067059652881 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202782739143 0.210909579961 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857454140355 0.0618886996521 139% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.