Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
There have been several disputed discussions on whether technology has made children less creative or not, especially if we compare with the past. As for everything, there are always two sides to every question. Personally, I believe that technology has made children more creative and more analytics than in the past. I feel this for two reasons, which I explore in the following ways.
To begin with, technology has made children inter-dependent as compare to the past where children are dependent on teachers and elder ones. My personal experience is a compelling example of this; About 15 years ago, I enrolled in math class. During my early age, I found trigonometry very difficult and not able to solve the question without the help of teachers. However, today I was able to do every question of trigonometry very confidently and interdependently, and the reason for such interdependency is you-tube(a glimpse of technology). Therefore, through technology, children become more technical as compared to the past.
Besides, It is seen that children have developed hydroelectric products at the age of 14, and this is possible only through advancement in current technology. In the past, it was difficult to imagine that a child can develop hydroelectric products, and the reason is no advancement of technology in that period. For better understanding, let us look at the instance of my brother, about 15 years ago, my brother shared with me an idea to develop a hydroelectric car; however, he did not develop such a car. He was not able to execute his plan at that time, however, later on, His kid, made hydroelectric microwave oven at the age of 14, and he did this with the help of the internet and other technology babies.
In conclusion, although in some scenarios, technology has made children sluggish as compared to the past. Nevertheless, these scenarios do not make children less creative. Thus, I personally believe that technology has made kids smarter because they are interdependent now and because they can execute their plan if we compare it with the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | DHANDA | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Harutyun Aslanyan | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 3 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Shiimaaa | 66 | view |
- The extended family( grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than in the past. 3
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 26
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 66
- People must be able to make their own decisions without relying on advice or inputfrom others. 60
- Sea otters are a small mammal that lives in the waters along North America's west coast from California to Alaska. A few years ago some of the sea otter populations off of the Alaskan coast started to decline rapidly and raised several concerns beca 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as for, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12244897959 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09157796205 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507288629738 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5294407527 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8125 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307298059896 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104319034234 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916815573792 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206793887241 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943663542648 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.