Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Television advertising is an effective medium to let consumers know about a company’s products. It is one of the fastest options to reach to the customers. Even though it may seem that advertising always benefits people well, these advertisings, however, create harmful impact when it directs at young children.
Children learn things fast by observing things around them. They drive themselves mostly in subconscious mind as they cannot distinguish between right and wrong. For this reason, an advertisement, having a wrong message, which children watch on television, often fill their head with incorrect information. For example, my younger brother when he was young used to believe that eating candy chocolate would fulfil anyone’s vitamin deficiency and make anyone stronger; acting on this false perception, which he got from a Tv advertisement, eventually turn his healthy teeth into full of cavities.
Children tend to imitate more than adult people. This characteristic often leads them to act dangerously. I remember, when I was ten-year-old, I, along with one of my friends, jumped from our one-story building’s rooftop and broke our legs. A Tv advertisement conveyed a wrong idea showing that a child after drinking their new launched juice product would get somewhat superman type power to fly. This crazy idea swayed my childish mind, and without considering the consequences, I jumped and got myself injured.
Tv advertisements are the most likely reasons that create pressure on parents. Children watching Advertisements on television force their parents to buy the products and often time don’t stop crying until they get it. The products sometimes are expensive and unnecessary. Parents, despite having the unwillingness to buy, spend money to fulfill their children’s desire. Furthermore, this attitude makes children believing in a wrong perception of life that they would get whatever they want, and when children don’t get things according to their wish in future, they cannot accept the fact and become frustrated.
For the reasons stated above, one cannot disagree with the fact that advertisements directed towards young children are harmful, and government, therefore, in all countries should introduce laws to ban this practice
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 76 | view |
2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 60 | view |
2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 90 | view |
2023-05-13 | Thomas2028 | 66 | view |
2023-04-24 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ences, I jumped and got myself injured. Tv advertisements are the most likely re...
^^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are sometimes
... crying until they get it. The products sometimes are expensive and unnecessary. Parents, des...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 552, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...on’t get things according to their wish in future, they cannot accept the fact and become...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
...or the reasons stated above, one cannot disagree with the fact that advertisements directed towards young c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51289398281 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98187616359 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644699140401 0.524837075471 123% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0752525614 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175051741345 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513123255499 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057828489481 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114026079783 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696545504289 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.