Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
I agree with the given statement that television advertising directed towards the young children at the age of (two to five) should not be allowed. There are various reasons to have this opinion.
To start with, young age is very crucial age in development of the child. Every parents are more focused on their children at this specific age of growth and development. Parents try their best to inculcate morals and values; try to make understand their child about what is wrong and right. Thus it is important that whatever their child is learning get screened before it reaches to their child. Child at this age can be demanding thus, parents have to listen to them as they are very young and naive. But one cannot allow themselves to provide their child whatever they wish.
Secondly, if you talk about television, one cannot have control on what is being displayed on it. Television do not screen the content as per the age group. However, when you have to talk about the specific advertisement which are directed towards the young children, the content presented in them is capable of attracting the children towards it. In such situations there is every possibility that child would ask their parents to get them whatever they feel fascinating. Also child cannot discriminate between what is wrong and what is right thus, they can fall prey to wrong products and end up asking about it.
Let us consider few examples. There are numerous products such as chocolates which provide complementary toys with them to attract children. The complementary toys being given may not be specifically harmful to the child but the processed food at this young age is not recommended. Another example can be health drinks; there are varied health drinks available in the market and the companies try to attract children with various tricks, which can be chocolate flavored drinks, etc. Even though the taste of such drinks might be appealing but the nutrient contents must be checked before allowing your child to have them. Such cases are the ones where child fall prey for wrong things and can be demanding for it which might affect their health and well being.
Thus overall looking at the situation, it is important for your children to have understanding of what is good and bad. But discriminating between this at such young age cannot be expected from the children. Thus I believe that the television advertising directed towards young children should not be allowed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-13 | Thomas2028 | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-24 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
- Learning ideas and concepts is important than knowing the facts 60
- agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated Groveton s honor code replaced a system in which teachers closely monitored students Under that system teachers reported an average of t 55
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our latenight news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints rec 58
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 73
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...rucial age in development of the child. Every parents are more focused on their child...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ir child about what is wrong and right. Thus it is important that whatever their chi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to get'
Suggestion: to get
...t that whatever their child is learning get screened before it reaches to their chi...
^^^
Line 2, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...em as they are very young and naive. But one cannot allow themselves to provide t...
^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...et them whatever they feel fascinating. Also child cannot discriminate between what ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ht affect their health and well being. Thus overall looking at the situation, it is...
^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e cannot be expected from the children. Thus I believe that the television advertisi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 15.1003584229 212% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93509615385 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57096824707 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442307692308 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6589321101 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3181818182 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13636363636 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35868151178 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122302451413 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164112536294 0.0737576698707 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27071998737 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160530235408 0.0645574589148 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.