television advertising directed toward young children(aged two to five) should not be allowed
The author of the statement stated that television advertising directed toward young children(aged two to five) should not be allowed. Many of us will argue that it will hold all the time, while others will counter the statement. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide the sound reasoning for the same.
Television advertisements have both good and bad effects on young children aged two to five, for example, my niece who is five years old and likes watching television a lot. One day she saw an advertisement that wearing a jacket will make her fly in the sky and after watching that advertisement, she starts asking for this jacket like anything and tried to do everything to get it, because she wants to fly like the child in the advertisement did, but in reality, it is not possible. So advertisement on television has a direct impact on children. The children don’t know how to react to these advertisements and just do what the advertisement says.
But advertisement on television has a good impact on children also, again I will explain this with my niece reaction to a television advertisement. One day she was watching TV and in an advertisement, she saw that if she will drink milk every day she will become a superhero. And this advertisement directed her to drink milk every day. My whole family was trying their level best to make her drink milk every day, but they failed every single day. But this advertisement did the job in just a few minutes. So, the advertisement might have a positive impact also on children's behavior.
Last but not the least, I think the product owner should the responsibility to evaluate the advertisement before broadcasting, especially if the advertisement is for children. Because a child won't have that much sense to understand what is good or bad for them. Or the advertising broadcaster or the government should take a call whether the advertisement for the children aged between 2 to 5 should get broadcast on the television or not.
In nutshell, some of the advertisements are good for children and some have a bad impact on them. So to protect children from getting badly impacted by the advertisement, the government or the product owner must be vigilant and must take proper action to avoid the advertisement that will have a bad impact on children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-13 | Thomas2028 | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-24 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 50
- television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 14, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... the television or not. In nutshell, some of the advertisements are good for children an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82920792079 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03980048225 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450495049505 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5073082147 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.388888889 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.45110844103 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347696154179 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136223689534 0.076458572812 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142461059824 0.0737576698707 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197506843447 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696474648456 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.