test
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, the issue of parents' spending time with their kids engendered copious controversies among people. Some people are inclined toward opinion that parents should use their time to play with their children and have fun. However, others may take an opposite view point and believe that there are more beneficial for children, if parents help in their schoolwork. As far as I am concerned, parents should spend their time with children for school work. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned argument, there are more advantage for children when their parents spend their time with them for doing schoolwork. Consequently, it is highly recommended that all parents around the world spend more time with their children and get involved in their schoolwork. In fact, there are a myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could not be mentioned but are not embraced due to the dearth of time.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-24 | nagina | 40 | view |
2023-07-24 | nagina | 70 | view |
2023-02-22 | cocoza@gmail.com | 83 | view |
2022-08-16 | ShayesteTR | 70 | view |
2022-08-16 | ShayesteTR | 70 | view |
- TPO28 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. 71
- Old friends vs new friends 60
- TPO 69 80
- A/D: “It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.” 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 340, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... their schoolwork. In fact, there are a myriad of other reasons, challenging the above...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 1977.66487455 44% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 169.0 407.700716846 41% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18934911243 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 4.48103885553 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.739881391 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 212.727598566 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627218934911 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 618.680645161 41% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6267292017 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 86.8835125448 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.