[TPO 22] Teacher should not make their political or social views in the classroom.
Whether teachers should talk to students about their social or political views in the classroom or not remains much controversial. Many people argues that teachers should tell students about their social opinions. However, I disapprove of this idea because of two main reasons: students' misunderstanding and negative behaviors.
To begin with, if teachers have unlikely opinions of a person or a social problems, students are likely to approve of the view, misunderstanding the plot. The teachers might sometimes have misunderstanding of social problems. Therefore, students, who tend to learn what their teachers say, would be likely to have the same misunderstanding as their teachers. A famous math teacher in my school, Mr. Luong, would be a perfect illustration for this. In his class, he often tells us that math is the only way to succeed and he undervalues other careers than mathematicians. Thanks to him, most students in my class have the same viewpoints. As a result, many people in my class stop doing social voluntary work to focus on studying math. In contrast, if the teacher just kept his opinion in mind, the situation would not have happened.
In addition, when students believe in their teachers views, they can have negative behavior. Students are not as mature as their teachers; thereby, by teachers telling them some of their social views, they can have unexpected actions which could lead to bad consequences. For instance, when my old teacher showed his contemptuous for helpers, I had the same views as him. After that, I went home and told her that she was not important, and I laughed at her. When I am older, I realized that every jobs are equally important and that my behaviors were wrong. That's one of the example that teachers' social views can lead to students' bad behaviors. Another example is when my Chemistry teacher talked about Mr. Donald Trump - the current U.S President. He told me that Donald Trump was not intelligent and he became rich not because of his efforts. Thus, I had bad impression on Donald Trump and posts bad things of him on Facebook. Not long after, I accidentally read a book about Mr. Trump, and I changed my mind. Those are the reasons why teachers' political and social views can lead to students' unexpected behavior.
In conclusion, teacher should not tell students their social views in classroom due to students' misunderstanding of the issues and their unexpected following behavior.
- A lot of students decide to start college right away after graduate school while others believe that it’s much more beneficial to take a gap year. Which do you prefer? 73
- Governments should not invest in funding public libraries as computers could fulfill all the functions of them. Agree or disagree? 100
- Governments should not invest in funding public libraries as computers could fulfill all the functions of them. Agree or disagree? 73
- Governments should not invest in funding public libraries as computers could fulfill all the functions of them. Agree or disagree? 73
- [TPO 22] Teacher should not make their political or social views in the classroom. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...likely opinions of a person or a social problems, students are likely to approve of the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...rtant and that my behaviors were wrong. Thats one of the example that teachers social...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... about Mr. Donald Trump - the current U.S President. He told me that Donald Trump...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02948402948 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88802359187 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498771498771 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7670390044 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6956521739 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.85842293907 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298839320486 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100778469593 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113444800015 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245303257554 0.150856017488 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841864374315 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.