TPO 27 agree or not
If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.
In today's VUCA (volatile and complex) world, finding a job is really hard rather than seeking a suitable one. There are mutually exclusive ideas regarding whether people must fit in the job that is availabe for them at the time or they do not have to stop looking for their favorite job until they find it. In my personal view, I am inclined to the latter notion in spite of the fact that the former has more aficionados among adults. My answer to this debating bone of contention is twofold, and in the following, the rationale behind it will be elaborated by the most outstanding, solid proofs.
The first and foremost reason which is worth mentioning is that individuals will eagerly work in their majors provided that they love their jobs. Moreover, in that case, they enthusiastically want to improve themselves and develop their work-related skills, mainly because they are satisfied with their jobs. Through the lens of academics, researchers of RMIT, a renowned university in Australia, concluded that an individual must devote 10,000 hours if they want to be professional in a specific field. They insist that if they do not like that job personally, they will not take that amount of time for their development and finally will lose their interest. To put it into a more vivid picture, my friend, Ali, is into making model airplanes. However, his parents, especially his mother, forced him to work as a clerk in an office which he hated alot. After challenging himself to accept his destiny, he quit that job and continued his prospective hobby and worked at least twelve hours a day to reach his objectives. Now, he is a well-known creative modeler whose airplanes are being sold for a hefty amount of money.
The second and equally far-reaching explanation to bear in mind is that following the dream job will increase self-esteem and self-confidence which is hardly achieved if a person do not like what they do. As an illustration, I had been working in a post-tentioning concrete factory in Kerman province before I finished my service in military. My manager once asked me to stay and work for them, but as that job did not fulfill my eagerness, which made me unhappy and depressed, I quickly rejected his offer and got out of there. In that time, I knew I was going to be a stock market trader for the rest of my life; threfore, without any hesitation I followed my dream although my parents were not supporting me because of my decision. At last, after working my head off for five years, I mastered my field and now make a preponderance amount of money each and every year. If I had stayed in that former job, I could not have raised my self-esteem to pursue my goal.
In conclusion, taking all the aforementioned facts into account, I think that waiting to find a personal satisfactory job is better in comparison to work anyway. This action will be professionally profitable for people insomuch as they are eager to develop their skills and competencies. Moreover, as they are pleased, their self-esteem and self-confidence will not decrease.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-27 | HSNDEK | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | heartqq | 80 | view |
| 2022-10-15 | pp in your area | 88 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | Hello GRE | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-09 | mohammadkmi | 70 | view |
- TPO 22 independent agree or not teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 73
- at universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 90
- The article asserts that working in a four day workweek setting is extremely beneficial for both companies and employees However the lecturer completely disagrees with this idea and rejects all three reasons mentioned in the passage His opposite explanati 80
- TPO 21 integrated genetically modified trees are good because they are designed to be harder than natural trees they have many economically benefits their utilization can prevent over exploitation of wild trees 70
- TPO 44 independent having fun with kids is better or helping them do their homework 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, really, regarding, second, so, thus, well, at least, i think, in conclusion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 83.0 43.0788530466 193% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2543.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 528.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81628787879 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86782639488 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 212.727598566 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551136363636 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.1092831252 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.095238095 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95238095238 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204459146803 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631272440278 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530210815279 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14360958576 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048411775432 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.