TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:
justify;line-height:normal;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Lucida Sans Unicode",sans-serif">Needless to say that correcting others mistake is one of the most significant responsibilities of members in a classroom or in a meeting. Actually, one of the most underscoring ideals of each community is improving knowledge and awareness of the group. Meanwhile, this action ought to be performed by considering morality and perspective. May some opt other methods to note the leader's errors; However; I am firmly of the belief that In order to correct the lecturer's mistake the most appropriate manner is waiting for ending the class or meeting and talking to the person in private. The two underlying reasons are going to substantiate my standpoint.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:
justify;line-height:normal;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Lucida Sans Unicode",sans-serif">The first fact that leads me hold this belief is that the reputation of the leader should be kept. In fact, utilizing this manner the person will be led to save his respect and character. in addition, he will be noticed that his speaking is checking by the audiences and he ought to strengthen his knowledge by studying and more enterprise. Nevertheless, by interrupting during the class actually, his fortune to correct himself and trying not to repeat the mistake will be lost. For example, while solving a mathematic problem, our mathematics professor had a miscalculation which lead the answer be inaccurate. However, the rest of the student did not noticed the error, at the end of the class I asserted the problem and he replied that he would recheck it. The next session he explained the error to the class and apologized the class. All the students shocked because after the session they were talking that provided that he did not tell the problem, no one would realize the error. This action lead the professor not repeat his mistake until the end of the semester.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:
justify;line-height:normal;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Lucida Sans Unicode",sans-serif">Another reason which deserves some words here is that might our understanding about the subject is not correct. Generally, teachers and speakers check their documents before they want to exploit them. Therefore, a subject may comes to audiences mind spontaneously, but there is no guarantee that the professor's assertion is not correct. By postponing the subject to the end of the meeting and checking it with him the problem will be easily solved.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:
justify;line-height:normal;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Lucida Sans Unicode",sans-serif">To put it briefly, the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that explaining the issue to lecturer privately is the most profitable solution. Not
only will it save the </span></p>
- TPO 29 Integrated writing 48
- TPO52 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- TPO 45. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 73
- TPO-42 78
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Justify
...0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:normal;mso-layout-grid-alig...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , sans-serif&apos
...t-family:"Lucida Sans Unicode",sans-serif'>Needless to say that correcting others...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Justify
...0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:normal;mso-layout-grid-alig...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , sans-serif&apos
...t-family:"Lucida Sans Unicode",sans-serif'>The first fact that leads me hold this...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... led to save his respect and character. in addition, he will be noticed that his s...
^^
Line 5, column 853, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'notice'
Suggestion: notice
...owever, the rest of the student did not noticed the error, at the end of the class I as...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1200, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'leads'.
Suggestion: leads
...ne would realize the error. This action lead the professor not repeat his mistake un...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Justify
...0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:normal;mso-layout-grid-alig...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , sans-serif&apos
...t-family:"Lucida Sans Unicode",sans-serif'>Another reason which deserves some wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 499, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...sly, but there is no guarantee that the professors assertion is not correct. By postponing...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Justify
...0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:normal;mso-layout-grid-alig...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , sans-serif&apos
...t-family:"Lucida Sans Unicode",sans-serif'>To put it briefly, the aforementioned ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, briefly, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3162.0 1977.66487455 160% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 7.49289099526 4.8611393121 154% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 11.5628031896 2.67179642975 433% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507109004739 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 882.9 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.51630824373 138% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 164.769399517 48.9658058833 336% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 186.0 100.406767564 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8235294118 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0435998326526 0.236089414692 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0199088804008 0.076458572812 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269378808856 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0231133615221 0.150856017488 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256474754073 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.3 11.7677419355 223% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 4.82 58.1214874552 8% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.6 10.1575268817 183% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 26.46 10.9000537634 243% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.