Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Mistakes are an inevitable part of every works. It is not possible fro individuals, who whether are intelligence or not, to make mistakes when they do their tasks. Some people believe that everyone should not interrupt interfere the mistakes at all, while others hold an opposite view. In my opinion, I personality prefer to correct the mistake right away when person make this mistake for two noticeable reasons.
The main reason is that if students do not intervene the statement of teacher who make mistake, others misunderstand and confront sequence bad result. Some students are not careful about anythings such as what teacher teaches that cause them not to notice subjects when they study for exams. If anybody mention teacher's mistake quickly, those students face a serious problem. For example, when I was in high school, I tried to accept in university. One day, my mathematics instructor could not be present in class and so school manager appoint other teacher for that session. Unfortunately, he made a severe mistake that cause all pupils to understand incorrectly. I wanted to mention his error but I was fearful due to the fact I thought I had basic knowledge about math. As over time, when I and my friend took exam for arriving university, I ran into a controversial question, which temporary teacher taught us inaccurate. I could answer that test correct while my friend who never take care to the class fail. Consequently, I could concede to university. If I had interrupted teacher's course when made mistake, my friend now would have be student in university.
On the other hand, interrupting right away have negative effect, if people interrupt the statement of others who make mistake, may cause them can not to remember what say. Individual's brain is very vulnerable about tiny sound when they speak in meeting. If anyone interrupt their speaking, they may not concentrate on their speak right away. This event may cause the important meeting to dismantle and create serious problem. For instance, when I was working at insurance company, I was manager there. I hired one person who was not experienced. One day, we had a vital meeting for developing our company which may be bankrupt. When I started to speak in order to attract attention of other companies to incorporate with us, I made a minuscule error inadvertently. My new employee interrupted my statement, and so I lost my focus. Therefore, I could not affect on vision of member of meeting. If my worker never had interfered in my speak, now my company would have have several branch instead of disintegrating.
In conclusion, people should correct everyone's mistake right away. Not only they help other prevent misunderstanding, but also they cause speaker can not remember what has said. We should be polite and do not interfere in others' statement.
- : agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Use specific examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 60
- summarize the points made in the lecture about save all species that may become extinct, being sure toexplain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about safeguarding of endangered species . 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...part of every works. It is not possible fro individuals, who whether are intelligen...
^^^
Line 5, column 1141, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... made mistake, my friend now would have be student in university. On the othe...
^^
Line 9, column 265, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'interrupts'.
Suggestion: interrupts
...d when they speak in meeting. If anyone interrupt their speaking, they may not concentrat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 855, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...I lost my focus. Therefore, I could not affect on vision of member of meeting. If my work...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 962, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: have
...fered in my speak, now my company would have have several branch instead of disintegratin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 967, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... in my speak, now my company would have have several branch instead of disintegratin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2378.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02748414376 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85111422375 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8598566592 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3103448276 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.79310344828 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 19.0 3.85842293907 492% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16174606458 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446076825821 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412063037121 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10625035201 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207100745825 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.