Tpo22
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
People's social and political attitudes plays prominent roles in their life. It comes as no surprise that efforts to finding the importance of sharing these attitudes with others have been always among the top priorities. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is that whether teachers should share their social and political views with their students or not. I, to a great extent concur with the fact that teachers should not share these attitudes. The rationale behind this thesis will be elaborated by the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point that makes me hold this belief is that political and social attitudes are completely personal views and no body have the right to force others to accept his/her ideas specially people who are really effective in the society like teachers. Students are really receptive of what teachers say and how they behave since they spend so much time with them. Teachers must be aware of their behavior in the classroom and do not say something or act in the way that affect students' attitudes. Perhaps a more specific experience can shed more light on the matter. When I was in the university, I had a Jewish professor while I am Muslim. Every day he talked about Jewish cultures and his belief but no body attend to his talking since everybody has their own belief and consider it as a personal view and nobody can change it.
Another reason deserving some words here is that the truthiness or falseness of attitudes depends on the people's view and sharing ideas may cause irrecoverable problems. Many views are true from a view point and they may be wrong from a different aspects; so, people can allow others to decide what is appropriate and what is not suitable for them. Consider a teacher believing in a special behavior like honking in the street, while their students think it is wrong. Everyone watch it from a special view. Teacher assume honking make their drivers aware of the dangers, but students think it causes sound pollution and it is not a proper behavior. Sharing this idea in the classroom makes students disappointed of him.
Finally, yet importantly, making attitudes known to the students leads to the close relationship with them which causes bad effects on their relations. Teachers always must keep a safe distance between them and their children since so much closeness makes children rude. They do not follow the teacher's instruction and controlling them is really difficult. As I remember, in the high school, I had a teacher who made his attitudes known to the students. Since the students feel comfortable with him, they really annoy him and did inappropriate works in the class and my teachers could not lead them.
In conclusion, contemplating all the aforementioned paragraphs, one can soon realize that it is better for teachers that do not share their views with students since not only are they personal matters, but also attitudes are relative matters and it makes students rude. It is highly recommended that teachers not underestimate the value of keeping safe distance with the students and focus on the material of the class for having an efficient classroom.
- TPO 2 Independent Question Agree or disagree Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 95
- When you have been friends with someone for a long time, is it important for you to continue the friendship even if that person does something you don't like? 90
- TPO20Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well. 73
- TPO 3: Agree or disagree: It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 73
- Tpo22Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...tudes are completely personal views and no body have the right to force others to accep...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 715, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...bout Jewish cultures and his belief but no body attend to his talking since everybody h...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'aspect'?
Suggestion: aspect
... and they may be wrong from a different aspects; so, people can allow others to decide ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...s children rude. They do not follow the teachers instruction and controlling them is rea...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, really, regarding, so, while, in conclusion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2656.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 534.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97378277154 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63828104445 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49063670412 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 814.5 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4419997331 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314532218923 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089444905911 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789674182773 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180673225078 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317304425508 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.