Tpo23-people believe that it would be better to work quickly and carelessly
An issue of concern turning into an obsession is the rapid pace of life which contributes to some problems. Different people have distinct perspectives when it comes to whether or not one should attempt hard to do tasks more quickly. Although a plethora of people believe that it would be better to work quickly and carelessly, I, personally, disagree with that point of view. My reasons are manifold, among which the most significant ones are substantiated in the following paragraphs.
Beyond a shadow of doubt, it is not indispensable to turn a blind eye to the quality of a work, on the grounds that nothing compensates quality. As a matter of fact, we should not sacrifice the quality for the number of something. Although at first blush, it seems that doing any activity even without any cautious reaches us apex of success instantly, it will have adverse effects in a long period of time since almost all individuals place a high value on how well a thing is done, either it is a service or a product. For instance, if we have the chance of identifying the quality of a tool and want to opt between the quality and quantity, It is crystal clear that we would choose the better tool in terms of quality.
In addition to the priority of quality compared with the quantity, the outcome of an appropriate activity is beneficial for the doer’s reputation. According to a research, done by the economy department of Florida University in 2008, the business which are associated with a high quality product are more successful than others. This translates into that, as a long term goal a clever person focus on the quality rather than quantity. Therefore, people will trust on the product, actually when he or she has a long term goal. In other words, the higher the quality, the more successful it will be. Furthermore, performing slowly, he or she has the opportunity to learn a lot about it since they can contemplate and discover new matters. For instance, a person can read a book quickly by a week, but when he/she sleeps on it for one month, it is more likely to infer numerous points.
To sum up, considering different aspects of this issue we can draw the conclusion that working slowly and carefully is by far more advantageous than performing something quickly and carelessly. Due to the influences of quality on the reputation and the importance of how well an act is done among people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-24 | Rasna James | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | PRACHI DAVE | 70 | view |
| 2017-07-02 | meysamkh | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... it will have adverse effects in a long period of time since almost all individuals place a hi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, as a matter of fact, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7661097852 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80217357355 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536992840095 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5327020169 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.470588235 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6470588235 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147462148803 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491147383579 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102450664115 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958779600534 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741390262413 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.