TPO29- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
In today's progressive world, no one can turn a blind eye to the significant effects of education in our life. Some people argues that to improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on professor's salaries. On the other extreme of the rope, other hold the opposite opinion. Although both sides take their own positions, personally speaking, I firmly believe that the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraph, I will explain my reasons to justify my points of view.
As the first and paramount reason, a good salary for professors will increase the access of books and academic courses for them. To be more specific, with more money professors will get more academic knowledge, ideas and concepts. Hence, they will be exposure to different horizons and it will help them to lern skills to improve the quality of the education. Take the Japan's education as an example. Nowadays, Japan has one of the best ranking education of the world due the fact of access of technologies and a good payment. So, if Japan had not provided for professor a great salary, nor could professors get an excellent quality education neither could they have access of academic tools.
The second reason coming to my mind to substantiate my viewpoint is that a good amount of money for professors will relive their financial worries. In other words, they will have more time to spend in classes and research than think in their economic problems. As a result, they will increase the quality of education. For instance, a data analyze conducted by some master scientists shows that professors who do not have financial worries improved the quality of education in their university three times more than the professors who have economic problems. This specific argument points out the importance of a great financial life.
In conclusion, take the above reasons into account, I strongly believe that more cash in professor's salaries will increase the quality of education, not only for the access of academic tools that it can provide, but also it relieves their financial stress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | subashdevkota | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | pativ7 | 76 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Hello GRE | 76 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | Maryam Madson | 73 | view |
- TPO 2 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 78
- TPO19 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 71
- TPO26 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents jobs 70
- TPO23 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 71
- Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05172413793 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66085747551 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508620689655 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6958497705 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.411764706 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292397269966 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906766592104 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924923566602 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175545326518 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359929753568 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.