TPO42
There is no doubt that always teachers have had a substantiate role in every society. A controversial question which arises here is whether or not teachers were more appreciated in the past than nowadays. Some people may hold the idea that nowadays, community admires teachers more than before, while I am of the opinion that teachers appreciated more in the former times. There are numerous grounds, two of which I will explore in what follows.
The first noteworthy point which bears in mind is that nowadays students have free access to the internet and lots of comprehensive books. Therefore, they search whatever they want on the internet instead of asking their questions from their teachers. As a consequence, most students think that they can solve their problems readily without help of their teachers. Hence, they do not admire their teachers as much as students in the past. It is no secret that in the past students did not have access to the internet or lots of resources for getting extra information about a subject. Accordingly, they could not solve their problems on their own, so they needed their teacher's help. Undoubtedly, when students were very dependent on the knowledge of their teachers, they appreciated them more. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Back in college, I had a class with a well-known professor who won several awards in his field of study. While he was a very famous professor, students who studied intensively before the class through different websites, always underestimate the points that the professor mentioned in the class. These students thought that because of their shallow knowledge, they could underrate a well-rounded professor. I believe that this example shows how easy students could be offensive about their teachers nowadays.
The second crucial point which deserves some words here is that in the contemporary world, the number of teachers has increased incredibly. As a result, the government has to allocate less money and facilities to each of them. In contrast, in olden days, the numbers of teachers were limited because the number of educated individuals in the past was less than now. Since the presence of few teachers, schools pay a lot more money and provided numerous facilities for each one of their teachers. Thus, because of the decrease in salary which teachers get, they think that society admires them less than before. For instance, my mother has been a teacher for 20 years. In the past she took a high salary, but now because of the number of new teachers their salary significantly has decreased.
On the whole, based on the points mentioned above, we can conclude that in the past societies more appreciate teachers because in the past not only students were more dependent to their teachers but also their number was less than now.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... no doubt that always teachers have had a substantiate role in every society. A controversial ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...roversial question which arises here is whether or not teachers were more appreciated in the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2370.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03184713376 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68161187217 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492569002123 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.9 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.405561189 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.