Universities should require every graduation student to take public speaking courses.
Undoubtedly, not enforcing graduation students to take extra classes may be very beneficial since students will have more time to do academic learning. However, they will lose a precious opportunity to hone their social skills. Therefore, I could hardly agree more with the idea that universities should require every graduation student to take public speaking courses, the reasons for which would be illustrated as follows.
Initially, there are several merits for students. For one thing, taking public speaking classes will improve their academic performance. Taking with friends as well as acquaintances and learning some tips of communicating, students would hone their interpersonal skills. When accomplishing group graduation assignments, juveniles could communicate and express their own perspective more clearly. As a result, their study efficiency would be ameliorated. Therefore, motivating students to taking public speaking classes could enhance their academic performance. For another, it will lay a solid foundation for future career. To take public speaking courses will increase the possibility of making new acquaintances so it will enrich students’ social circle. When graduating from their universities and going into workplace, juveniles will have established a close rapport with people from different domains of work. Hence, they could exchange precious employment information and professional expertise which has a positive effect on their profession life. As a result, taking public speaking courses will pave the way for students’ future occupation. Therefore, only with the idea that every graduation student should take public speaking courses, can students derive such merits.
In addition, taking public speaking courses is conducive to universities. To state it more clearly, the well-rounded education would exhort and attract more youth to apply for these universities. With more upper-level students’ influx, the reputation of the schools would be raised. Moreover, more sponsors and donors will join the line to support the policy. Such a substantial amount of money would be regarded as a huge financial budget which could be utilized for upgrading experimental apparatus and embellishing teaching constructions. It is sensible for universities to require every graduation student to take public speaking courses.
A case in point is my Alma Mater, all graduation students are required to take public courses. This innovative policy is reported by journals and newspapers instantly. Not only high school students in my city desire to apply for my university, aiming for obtaining a well-rounded education, but also more corporations offer to donate money for supporting my university. Obviously, it is beneficial for universities to require graduation students to take public speaking classes. In conclusion, but for the help of such a creative policy, universities would not have derived advantages.
In a nutshell, based on my own experiences and social demands, I tend to believe that universities should require every graduation student to take public speaking courses.
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 76
- Universities should require every graduation student to take public speaking courses 85
- Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does 85
- People should know events happening around the world even if they have little influence on their daily lives 87
- You have long been friend with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n perspective more clearly. As a result, their study efficiency would be ameliora...
^^
Line 2, column 726, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y of making new acquaintances so it will enrich students’ social circle. When gra...
^^
Line 2, column 1241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion student should take public speaking courses, can students derive such merits...
^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xperiences and social demands, I tend to believe that universities should require...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 9.8082437276 265% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2661.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77223427332 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09162761521 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490238611714 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 826.2 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3702874763 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0740740741 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92592592593 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491770482939 0.236089414692 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167464159328 0.076458572812 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189152026658 0.0737576698707 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.355697424592 0.150856017488 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853134011409 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 10.9000537634 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.