Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People spend a lot of time at work and it is crucial for them to be satisfied with their jobs. Personally, I agree with the statement that people are happier when their job is diverse. There are a few reasons why I hold this opinion.
First of all, when workers assigned to do different tasks, their work routine becomes interesting. A various job gives people an opportunity to learn something new about a field they work in, which can be a quite fascinating process. Moreover, when during a workday, employees are busy working on different assignments, their day goes fast. Conversely, if the job is uniform and monotonous, people get bored and being at work becomes a real challenge for them. My own experience is a compelling example of this. As a pharmacy technician, I have to do a myriad of things at work, such as talking to customers, answering phone calls, entering prescriptions in the computer system, and counting medication. Because of all these tasks to do, I always very busy at work, and my workdays go quickly. This is one of the reasons why I love my dynamic job.
Secondly, employees, who are able to accomplish many different tasks are noticed by employers and benefit financially. If a worker is effective and is capable of handling a variety of assignments, he has a chance to advance in his career. For instance, as I said above, I am a pharmacy technician, and my job assumes to perform a variety of things, and sometimes even simultaneously, such as answering a phone call and counting pills at the same time. Fortunately, I get along with this duty quite well. For that reason, after three months of hiring, a manager of the pharmacy offered me a position of a senior technician with an advanced salary. To that end, the diversified job is the one which helps people to excel.
To conclude, I strongly believe that a work, where people assigned to multiple tasks bring them more joy and benefits than the one, which is monotonous. This is because this kind of job is fascinating and helps to build a career promptly.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory nearyour community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this newinfluence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory?Explain your position. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products look better than they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory? Explain your position 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
..., employees, who are able to accomplish many different tasks are noticed by employers and bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g and helps to build a career promptly.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70752089136 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84582074208 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551532033426 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6345579939 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9473684211 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8947368421 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191876864581 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561761256282 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577958518211 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101123753638 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661849910837 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.