The lecturer argues that none of the evidence suggested in the reading passage is convincing to make sure that R. robustus was just a scavenger. However, it was an active moving hunter according to the lecture.
The lecturer maintains that the size of R. robustus is big enough to hunt baby psittacosaurs, dinosaurs that found in the stomach of R. robustus. In fact, most predators have twice bigger shapes than prey, and the mass of R. robustus was twice bigger than its prey. This counters the reading passage's claim that R. robustus was too small to hunt other animals.
The lecturer asserts that specific mammals in the modern world have the same legs with length and position as those of R. robustus. The modern mammals also have short and slightly side-positioned legs, but they can move fast up to fifteen kilometers per hour, which means the ancient mammals could do this as well. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that the ancient mammal's legs were not suitable for capturing prey.
The lecturer points out that R. robustus made use of its powerful jaws
when grabbing and holding food. Without using teeth, they employed jaws to swallow the whole prey or big pieces of it. This refutes the reading passage's claim that bones inside the stomach of R. robustus were absent of marks made by teeth.
- Tpo 9. Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.I completely disagree with this claim that nowadays children are less creative than they were in the past. Here you can see my reasons. 90
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- migration of Anasazi 85
- Cars have made a greater impact on society than airplanes 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
...ed in the reading passage is convincing to make sure that R. robustus was just a scaven...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, as to, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84581497797 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35450913119 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57268722467 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0548367916 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.7058823529 110.228320801 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.3529411765 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82352941176 7.06452816374 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178667717693 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507066314466 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462358907939 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918986270633 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458189070696 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.3589403974 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.0289183223 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.