bO You cant
The reading and the lecture are both the presence of life on planet Venus. The author of the text feels that extreme and inhospitable conditions on Venus would not give people a chance to live there. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He firmly believes that the ideas presented in the passage are skeptical because scientists can make a station far away from the surface that may provide all life conditions.
To begin with, the author claims that atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is not compatible with the human being. It is said that all spacecraft have landed on Venus have been crushed by pressure within an hour of landing, which meant humans might be crushed too. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that pressure is much lower on another side of Venus and almost equal with Earths' pressure. Additionally, he mentions that people can live in this place without any damage.
Secondly, the writer suggests that on Venus' surface, it is almost impossible to find reservoirs of water because all places are surrounded by chemicals. Even people cannot bring water supplies to Venus from Earth. The lecturer, however, refutes this by mentioning that gases that are located on the surface of Venus can be used to produce water. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that they contain some chemicals which can create a stream and with this action, people may not import water from Earth.
Finally, the author posits that very little sunlight reaches the planet's surface and 40 percent of it can get through the clouds because it is reflected back into space. It is stated that the deficiency of light would avert the use of solar power cells, which might create severe problems and a huge part of light might be prevented by clouds. In contrast, the lecturer thinks that people can use the energy of the Sun and reflected light at the same time. He notes that they can easily collect energy and live there comfortably.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-18 | KenanZeynal | 3 | view |
- Elephants behaviors 75
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 70
- In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources 70
- bO You cant 3
- vVav 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture are both the...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...not give people a chance to live there. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that may provide all life conditions. To begin with, the author claims that at...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive in this place without any damage. Secondly, the writer suggests that on Ve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople may not import water from Earth. Finally, the author posits that very lit...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 340.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83235294118 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38905194673 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532352941176 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6590246905 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6470588235 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.