compare the ideas of author and lecturer
The article and the lecture both deal with the painting of James McNeill Whistler. Whilst the author believed that the painting of white woman was Whistler’s work, the lecturer had different opinion about it. He thinks that the painting was not the original work of Whistler, but was painted by some other painters.
First, the author claims that after 3 years of death of Whistler, his friends organized an exhibition of his works and the painting of a women in white dress was also exhibited there. In contrast, the lecturer argues that the painting was not done by Whistler. He adds that there were no evidences to prove the author’s argument.
Second, the author asserts that the women in the white dress closely resembled the woman in the painting ‘the symphony of white’. He mentions that the style of painting i.e. the use of monochromatic palate also closely resemble the style used by Whistler. Again, the lecturer refutes the claim of author. He holds that the particular character was a famous subject in that time. Furthermore, although the style of art resembled to that of Whistler’s, there is no enough evidence and since that style of art was popular, other artists might have done the painting.
Another reason why author feels that the painting was done by Whistler, despite the lack of signature, is the presence of small butterfly in the painting. He mentions that the presence of small butterfly at the lower right side of painting was the evidence since all the paintings of Whistler had small butterfly. The lecturer, however, finds this claim dubious. He says that all the paintings of Whistler had butterfly on the upper side. In addition to being in wrong side, the butterfly was of different shape and color. There are also evidences suggesting that it was added much later after the painting was made.
To sum up, both the author and lecturer hold different views about the painting and hence, it is clear to say that they will have trouble finding the common ground on this issue.
- if your friend was looking to lose weight what ideas would you give him 60
- compare the ideas of author and lecturer 73
- If your local govt got donation from anonymous donor and wants to invest it in building a public facility which one would you recommend A public park a public pool or a public library 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
...bition of his works and the painting of a women in white dress was also exhibited there...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...tion of his works and the painting of a women in white dress was also exhibited there...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, in addition, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 344.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88953488372 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48091689117 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470930232558 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6280927967 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4444444444 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121455882615 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593021720517 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762100226928 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961314228785 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393466406722 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.