control the toad population
Both the lecture and the passage are about the advantages and disadvantages of various ways used to control the toad population which was introduced to Australia in 1935, for protecting farmers' crops. The passage brings out three ideas which it doubted are effective ways. On the contrary, the lecturer contradicts various viewpoints mentioned in the passage based on three reasons.
To begin with, the author of a passage suggests that building a national fence could be useful in preventing moving toads into the other side of the lake. However, the lecturer mentions that this fence is not a brilliant choice for this problem. She reminds us that young toads could jump through the fence and also the eggs could proceed with water to the other side of the fence.
In addition, the author of the passage asserts that the Australian government should initiate a campaign to attract volunteers to capture and destroy the toads.on the other hand, the lecturer thinks that this campaign could affect the population of national frogs too since they can not be identified from toads when they are young for untrained voluntaries.
In the end, the passage suggests using some kind of virus that developed to prevent toads from maturing and reproducing. the lecturer refuses this idea and reminds us that this virus could affect the ecosystem of the USA too. this kind of virus can transition to other nations by eggs or young toads which transport for research purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...nt toads from maturing and reproducing. the lecturer refuses this idea and reminds ...
^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ld affect the ecosystem of the USA too. this kind of virus can transition to other n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, in addition, kind of, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04508196721 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50981344552 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.5914117445 49.2860985944 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.1 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18996870031 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710982399584 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808772957336 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110950994913 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358775638163 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.