the effort to seek for standard certifications for wood companies will not lead to more companies favor to do
According to the reading, the effort to seek for standard certifications for wood companies will not lead to more companies favor to do it for three major important reasons, however, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First of all, the reading passage asserts that usually consumers don't pay enough attention to the advertisements entitled "new'" or "certified by standard organization". On the contrary, the professor holds the idea that people distinguish between certifications of independent organizations and only labeled products so, logically they attract to the first one.
Furthermore, the author claims that ecocertified products will be more expensive than the uncertified stuffs due to the fact that the company pay more money to achieve the certification. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up the idea that the decision criteria when the consumer wants to chose between two products is not only on the prices but also it depends on many factors that the cost is one of them.
Finally, the reading passage opines that pursuing certification affect the foreign commercial condition negatively but on the contrary, the lecturer dismisses this idea due to the fact that in trading, the foreign companies try to connect with domestic companies who have achieved independent international standards.
To sum up, both the author and the lecturer will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... passage asserts that usually consumers dont pay enough attention to the advertiseme...
^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any factors that the cost is one of them Finally the reading passage opines that ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31896551724 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97940562986 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 232.0 21.2450331126 1092% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1234.0 110.228320801 1119% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 232.0 21.698381199 1069% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 116.0 7.06452816374 1642% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369008015645 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.369008015645 0.0996497079465 370% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185286097805 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.209511141362 0.0443174109184 473% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 119.6 13.3589403974 895% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -172.46 53.8541721854 -320% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 95.0 11.0289183223 861% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.06 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.09 8.42419426049 227% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 10.7273730684 559% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 94.8 10.498013245 903% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 95.0 11.2008830022 848% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.