evidences which show were Pterosaurs able to fly or not
The text discusses the life of Pterosaurs which were giant animals lived long time ago and provides three reasons why they could not fly. On the other hand, the professor goes against all stated points, and by providing contradictional information states why she believes Pterosaurs could actually fly.
First, the text claims that Pterosaurs were cold-blooded animals like their modern reptules. It also states that all cold-blooded animals have a slow rate of metabolism which cannot provide enough energy in a short time to help these animals fly. The professor refutes this point and states that there are some evidences which indicate Pterosaurs had a dence hair cover on their body, and this feature is typical of warm-blooded animals. In this way she rejects that Pterosaurs were cold-blooded. She also mentions that warm-blooded animals can supply needed energy for flying, and in this way describes why she believes Pterosaurs could fly.
Second, as the text, based on the huge size of Pterosaurs and their weight, their airbones could not support them to fly. The professor goes against this claim and states that Pterosaurs were actually huge but not too heavy. She continues that their bones were hallow not solid, and as a result, despite of their large body, they were not too heavy. By this point she states why Pterosaurs were so heavy which restricts them from flying.
Third, the text mentions that all animals which could fly are able to run fast and take off from the ground, but Pterosaurs were not able to run fast enough which is need to help them to take off and fly. In contrast, the professor brings a point that although birds use their legs to run fast and take off, some other animals like bats walk on their four lems and pushes themselves to take off. We can also hear from her that Pterosaurs could use all their four legs to run fast which could make it possible for them to fly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-06 | talelaldabous | 71 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | talelaldabous | 71 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | talelaldabous | 65 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
| 2021-02-21 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- the reasons support a coin found in Canada is fake or not 66
- agree or not? people learn better from those who are at the same level of them rather than those people who are at high rank 73
- should we always tell the truth? 73
- online and traditional encyclopedias 73
- The text is discussing salvage logging which defines it as a way we aim to deal with dead trees and remove them and provides three reasons of support. The professor goes against all of the explained reasons and tells us why she is against the text. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'hallowed'.
Suggestion: hallowed
...vy. She continues that their bones were hallow not solid, and as a result, despite of ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bats'' or 'bat's'?
Suggestion: bats'; bat's
...t and take off, some other animals like bats walk on their four lems and pushes them...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, second, so, third, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82424242424 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37483748417 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442424242424 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0586936778 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261176900484 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108486617149 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710100804696 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162435730764 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222225906032 0.0443174109184 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.