how the Chaco great houses were used?
The passage and lecture both about "how the Chaco great houses were used?". The author states that, there were 100 rooms and many people used to live in the great house and give three reasons to support his point of view. However, the lecturer refutes each of the author points.
First of all, the writer posits that, Chaco structures purely residential with each housing 100 people. The lecturer contradicts with this point by saying that, if many people live there than many fire-place should have to be there but there are only few fire places. According to lecturer only 10 families can live there.
Second, reading implies that, Chaco structures were used to store food supplies like maize. Although the lecture claims that, if maize was supply from there than why there are no maize container?
Third, the writer expresses that, houses were used as ceremonial centers. The lecturer refute this point by supposes that, there are a lot of other material like rocks, sand etc. The lecturer assumes that, the house used as the constructed area. He indicate that, if the house used as a ceremonial center then why no trace container over there?
- "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen mo 45
- children should be required to help to learn cooking as soon as they are able to do so. 60
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 54
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e were 100 rooms and many people used to live in the great house and give three r...
^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have to be there but there are only few fire places. According to lecturer only ...
^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'containers'?
Suggestion: containers
... from there than why there are no maize container? Third, the writer expresses that, h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...sed as ceremonial centers. The lecturer refute this point by supposes that, there are ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'indicates'.
Suggestion: indicates
... house used as the constructed area. He indicate that, if the house used as a ceremonial...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 195.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95897435897 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22516832981 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9142731914 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5833333333 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341757745557 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140046420833 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152381126414 0.0662205650399 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212869242805 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146050443812 0.0443174109184 330% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.