Life on Mars
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss the possibility of life on Mars. The author of the passage argues that there is life on Mars while the lecturer opposes the author's opinion.
First, the reading passage claims that there is life on Mars because of the abundant amount of methane that has been found on Mars. In fact, the author believes that the presence of methane suggests that some living methanogens live on Mars. The professor counters this claim by arguing that the presence of methonagens does not prove the existence of Methane. She suggested that volcanic eruptions on Mars explain the presence of methane.
Second, the author states that the composition of a Marsian meteorite discovered in Antartica shows that it contains pure crystal of compound magnetite. This evidence suggests the presence of bacteria on Mars where the meteorite comes from. The professor counterargues this argument by pointing the fact that the meteorite reached Antartica 13000 years ago. Thus, it has been exposed to Earth's bacteria, which explains the presence of bacteria. As a result, the magnetite crystal does not indicate the presence of bacteria on Mars.
Third, the passage claims that NASA observed hydrogen on Mars in 2001, and it suggested the presence of liquid water on Mars. The professor disagrees with the finding by saying that the observation of hydrogen on Mars suggests the presence of Ice instead of water.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-12 | Attia Yaqoob | 80 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | attia | 80 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | Safa Arshad | 80 | view |
| 2018-09-26 | FMugisho | 83 | view |
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Twin Studies 60
- Animal Intelligence 66
- You must select a person to teach others to do a job. Which one of the following is the most important for you to consider in making your selection? the person’s education the person’s work experience the quality of the person’s previous work? Use s 60
- Altruism 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... on Mars while the lecturer opposes the authors opinion. First, the reading passage ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'earth'.
Suggestion: Earth
...years ago. Thus, it has been exposed to Earths bacteria, which explains the presence o...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the presence of Ice instead of water.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, thus, while, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15811965812 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55765928332 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482905982906 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.9 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9553206373 49.2860985944 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.8461538462 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245644990466 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970551355269 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105324903996 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17200097193 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962598362102 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.