the memoir of the Chevalier de Seingalt
The reading and the lecture both discuss about the memoir of the Chevalier de Seingalt. The author of the article doubts the accuracy of the content of the memoir. However, the professor argues that the memoir is very accurate and stated her reasons which will be elaborated in the following paragraphs.
First, the author claims that the Chevalier was not as wealthy as described in the memoir because he borrowed some money while in Switzerland. The professor disagree with this point. She explained that during those periods, people had to convert their assets to money which usually took a long time. Therefore, before Chevalier got his money, he had to borrow some money to fend for his needs, host parties and gamble. As a result, he borrowed money not because he was poor but because he could not get his assets converted on time.
Second, the author insinuates that the conversations in the Chevalier's memoirs were not accurate because they feel it is not possible to remember every detail of a conversation. However, the professor argues that this point is fallacious. She pointed that Chevalier wrote everything he recalled in a conversation every night. She supported this point by stating the evidence from Chevalier's friends who confirmed that he usually wrote his memoir from a book he recorded the previous conversations.
Finally, the author suggests that Chevalier escaped the prison by bribing his well-connected friends to free him. This point was invalidated by the professor. She explained that there were some other prisoners that had richer and more well-connected friends but still could not get out of the prison. She further emphasized an Old Venician report showed that when Chevalier escaped, the ceiling in his prison cell had to be repaired due to the damages caused through his escape.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-10 | funmiphysio | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | talelaldabous | 75 | view |
| 2021-01-03 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Brikena | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-27 | Mehralian | 83 | view |
- the memoir of the Chevalier de Seingalt 70
- Teachers influence students more than their friends 70
- American wood company ecocertification 73
- The expression Never never give up means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals Do you agree or disagree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11371237458 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7030654018 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52508361204 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1420256247 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5625 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244351642797 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888808386146 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12760428374 0.0662205650399 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17118543476 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132145216379 0.0443174109184 298% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.