The passage and lecture are both about replace using of plastic packing of food by using casein basrd plastic packages writer of passage gives three advantiges for using of casein based packages Lecturer castsc doubt on claim made in article He says the a

Essay topics:

The passage and lecture are both about replace using of plastic packing of food by using casein- basrd plastic packages. writer of passage gives three advantiges for using of casein -based packages. Lecturer castsc doubt on claim made in article. He says the advantiges given by author are actualy incorrect.
First, the author mentions, using casein packages reduce amount of waste, this is because casein is made from milk and protein. This point challenged by lecturer, He states, casein based wrape in vulnarble to water and envernments, furthermore ,it used by double wrape, therefore using of these type of package lead to a lot of waste materials.
Second, the author argues, wraping with casein -based wraps keep food fresh, this is mainly due to the fact that these packages low oxygen permeable. This argument rebutts by professor. He claims, the casein -based wraps vulnarable to water, in addition these wraps highly absorbed and release water, because casein film is thin, therefore using these wraps harm food.
Finally, the writer illustrater to nutritional benefite of casein -base packages since they cntain malk and protein. The professor in the other hand illustrates, these material have nutrition benefite to some people but harm others who have

The passage and lecture are both about replace using of plastic packing of food by using casein- basrd plastic packages. writer of passage gives three advantiges for using of casein -based packages. Lecturer castsc doubt on claim made in article. He says the advantiges given by author are actualy incorrect.
First, the author mentions, using casein packages reduce amount of waste, this is because casein is made from milk and protein. This point challenged by lecturer, He states, casein based wrape in vulnarble to water and envernments, furthermore ,it used by double wrape, therefore using of these type of package lead to a lot of waste materials.
Second, the author argues, wraping with casein -based wraps keep food fresh, this is mainly due to the fact that these packages low oxygen permeable. This argument rebutts by professor. He claims, the casein -based wraps vulnarable to water, in addition these wraps highly absorbed and release water, because casein film is thin, therefore using these wraps harm food.
Finally, the writer illustrater to nutritional benefite of casein -base packages since they cntain malk and protein. The professor in the other hand illustrates, these material have nutrition benefite to some people but harm others who have

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-01-10 talelaldabous 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Writer
...y using casein- basrd plastic packages. writer of passage gives three advantiges for u...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...le to water and envernments, furthermore ,it used by double wrape, therefore using...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, second, so, therefore, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 203.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25615763547 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42886617782 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605911330049 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4712404356 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.520113151245 0.272083759551 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201949699528 0.0996497079465 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180999051022 0.0662205650399 273% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313743243505 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.264313552121 0.0443174109184 596% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.