The Article claims that the atmosphere of Venus is extreme and inhospitable for the human to live there and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecture explains that the reasons are not enough to justify the reasons and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the article claims that the atmospheric pressure is not suitable for anything in Venus. However, the lecture refutes this point by saying that it is possible to live in Venus if the living place is being float fifty kilometer above the ground. This will not create extra pressure on the living place and on the human. Adopting this technique will prevent the living place to be crushed.
Second, the article posits that Venus contains no significant reservoirs of water and oxygen for the living species. However, the lecture opposes this point by saying that its atmosphere is mostly made up of carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid which can be used to produce water and oxygen. So, there is no necessity to import these substances from the earth.
Third, the article claims that the lack of light power in Venus will make the humans to be deprived of the electricity to power their machines and equipments. However, the lecture refutes this point by saying that the sunlight that reaches to the surface as well as the sunlight that reflects back both can be used to produce solar power. So, the point stated in the article is not necessarily true.
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas in which the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permi 89
- TOEFL integrated writing: fuel-cell engines 80
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 54
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 79
- TOEFL integrated writing: fuel-cell engines 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...f the living place is being float fifty kilometer above the ground. This will not create ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87704918033 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34351702013 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479508196721 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.9 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8157333495 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1666666667 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222333424466 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842928055059 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669549566819 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138984694709 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439614732083 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.