The reading passage and the lecture are both about replacement for vihcels' main source of power from internal -combution engine which are used gasoline or diesel to hydroger -based fuel -cell engine. The writer states three advantages from this replacement. However, the lecturer casts doubt on each advantage whichn is given by author.
First of all, the author states, one days the fuel which depend on petroleum one day will finish, But hydrogen needed for fuel -cell engine dose not easily depleted. This statement is challenged by professor. She says, hydrogen which is used as fuel only in pure state. It is difficul process to get hydrogen in pureform, especialy we need very cold tempreture about -53 to obtain pure hydrogen.
Second, the author asserts, hydrogen fuel cells are healthier for environment than interrnal - acombustion engine. The professor in the other hand refutes this notion. She states, complex process to obtain pure hydrogen need using petroleum or coal. These compnent as pollution to environment bas other fuel.
Finally, the writer contends, fuel -cells engine has economic value because, this car reguires only half the fuel energy than internal -combustion cars does to go same distance. The professor contradcts this argument. She says, the process to convert hydrogen to pure state need a lot of expensive equipments and materials. When we do it with cheap materials, this will effectb their performance.
The reading passage and the lecture are both about replacement for vihcals' main source of power from internal -combution engine which are used gasoline or diesel to hydroger -based fuel -cell engine. The writer states three advantages from this replacement. However, the lecturer casts doubt on each advantage whichn is given by author.
First of all, the author states, one days the fuel which depend on peyroleum one day will finish, But hydrogen needed for fuel -cell engine dose not easily depleted. This statement is challenged by profrssor. She says, hydrogen which is used as fuel only in pure state. It is difficul process to get hydrogen in pureform, especialy we need very cold tempreture about -53 to obtain pure hydrogen.
Second, the author asserts, hydrogen fuel cells are healthier for environment than interrnal -acombustion engine. The professor in the other hand refutes this notion. She states, complex process to mobtain pure hydrogen need using petroleum or coal. These compnent as pollution to environment bas other fuel.
Finally, the writer contends, fuel -cells engine has economic value because, this car reguires only half the fuel energy than internal -combustion cars does to go same distance. The professor contradcts this argument. She says, the process to convert hydrogen to pure state need a lot of expensive equipments and materials. When we do it with cheap materials, this will effectb their performance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-02 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- Government always fund many fields It support education and health Therefore government should spend money in very paramount things Whether the government should provid its support to arts or to athletcs as state sponsored teams this can be weighed in man 60
- The passage and lecture discusses the problem of declining of frog populations the writer gives several methods to solve this problem The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in articles she said non of these method offer solution for counter this declinati 76
- Government always fund many parts of sociaty But as we know these funding are limited Since government should has peiorty to suppor which feild that is more important than other Some believe that government should give funds to arts Other think athletics 60
- The passage and lecture are both discussing advanteges of smart cars The passage claim three advanteges of smart cars The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article She states smart cars are not clearly have advanteges First the writer states these 68
- The reading passage and lecture are both about benefits from working 4 days a week instead of 5 days a week the author claims three benefits from working 4 days a week for companies and employees The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article He co 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and the lecture are ...
^^
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one day', 'a day', or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: one day; a day; days
...hor. First of all, the author states, one days the fuel which depend on peyroleum one ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure about -53 to obtain pure hydrogen. Second, the author asserts, hydrogen fue...
^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the author asserts, hydrogen fuel cells are healthier for environment than inter...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llution to environment bas other fuel. Finally, the writer contends, fuel -cell...
^^^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ert hydrogen to pure state need a lot of expensive equipments and materials. When...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28260869565 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58075251698 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639130434783 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4239707924 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394067928911 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120934132436 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178823801308 0.0662205650399 270% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267591909993 0.162205337803 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.262434676324 0.0443174109184 592% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.